Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dreams of a Spirit-Seer and Kant’s Critical Method

Comments on Stephen R. Palmquist’s Kant and Mysticism

Bibliographic Data

ID20510321
AuthorsJ Colin Mcquillan (St. Mary's University, Texas, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume26
Issue1
Pages113-117
Publication date2021-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueKantian Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-4154 • E-ISSN: 2044-2394
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1369415420000461
OpenAlexW3111358013
LanguageEN
References cited1

In his new book, Kant and Mysticism, Stephen Palmquist argues that Kant had already formulated his critical method by the mid-1760s and that it emerged from his reflections on Swedenborg’s mystical visions. In order to evaluate these claims, I consider Kant’s correspondence with Charlotte von Knobloch and Moses Mendelssohn before and after the publication of Dreams of a Spirit-Seer ; the context in which Kant published Dreams ; and the method he employs when he discusses Swedenborg’s visions in that work. I conclude that Kant’s critical method was not well-formed during the 1760s and did not emerge from Kant’s reflections on Swedenborg

Epistemology · Mysticism · Theology · Vision · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Historical Philosophy and Science · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae