Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Do we Always Act on Maxims

Bibliographic Data

ID20510337
AuthorsSven Nyholm (0000-0002-3836-5932, Eindhoven University of Technology, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume22
Issue2
Pages233-255
Publication date2017-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueKantian Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-4154 • E-ISSN: 2044-2394
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1369415417000036
OpenAlexW2611821976
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited17

It is commonly thought that on Kant’s view of action, ‘everyone always acts on maxims’. Call this the ‘descriptive reading’. This reading faces two important problems. First, the idea that people always act on maxims offends against common sense: it clashes with our ordinary ideas about human agency. Second, there are various passages in which Kant says that it is ‘rare’ and ‘admirable’ to firmly adhere to a set of basic principles that we adopt for ourselves. This article offers an alternative: the ‘normative reading’. On this reading, it is a normative ideal to adopt and act on maxims: it is one of the things we would do if our reason were fully in control of our decision-making

Epistemology · Linguistics · Normative · Sociology · Computer Science · Free Will and Agency · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology

  • Parfit’s Mixed Maxim Objection against the Formula of Universal Law Reconsidered

    Open Access•Matthias Hoesch, Martin Sticker•The Journal of Value Inquiry•2021

  • The Apple of Kant's Ethics

    Open Access•Samuel Kahn•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2023

  • Cooperation – Kantian-style

    Open Access•Jan Willem Wieland•Inquiry•2024

  • Individual Maxim Tokens, not Abstract Maxim Types

    Open Access•Samuel Kahn•Kantian Review•2024

  • Maxims

    Open Access•Jon Mandle•Kantian Review•2024

  • Kant's Theory of Freedom

    Open Access•Henry E Allison•Kant's Theory of Freedom•1990

  • Kants Maximenethik und ihre Begründung

    Michael Albrecht•Kant-Studien•1994

  • The Robust Demands of the Good

    Philip Pettit•The Robust Demands of the Good•2015

  • Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness

    Open Access•Paul Guyer•Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness•2000

  • The Sources of Normativity

    Open Access•Christine M Korsgaard, Onora O’neill et al.•Sources of Normativity•1996

  • Kant and the Interests of Reason

    Sebastian Raedler•Kant and the Interests of Reason•2015

  • Implementation intentions

    Peter M Gollwitzer•American Psychologist•1999

  • Kant's Theory of Action

    Richard Mccarty•Kant's theory of action•2009

  • On K ant's Idea of Humanity as an End in Itself

    Open Access•Sven Nyholm•European Journal of Philosophy•2013

  • Self-Constitution

    Christine M Korsgaard•Self-constitution•2009

  • "Kants "Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten

    Dieter Schönecker, Allen W Wood•"Kants "Grundlegung zur…•2011

  • Interpreting Kant's Critiques

    Karl Ameriks•Interpreting Kant's Critiques•2003

  • Recent Work on Kantian Maxims I

    Open Access•Rob Gressis•Philosophy Compass•2010

  • Recent Work on Kantian Maxims II

    Open Access•Rob Gressis•Philosophy Compass•2010

Unique citing works5
Citations per year1
Citation span2021 - 2024 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae