Responses to Critics
What Makes Mysticism Critical? ( Or , What Makes Critique Mystical?)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20510342 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen R Palmquist (0000-0002-9448-8793, Hong Kong Baptist University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 137-162 |
| Publication date | 2021-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Kantian Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-4154 • E-ISSN: 2044-2394 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1369415420000436 |
| OpenAlex | W3111053074 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 5 |
After summarizing the content of my book, Kant and Mysticism (Palmquist 2019), I warn against four preliminary misconceptions. The book never argues that Kant viewed himself as a mystic, fully acknowledges Kant’s negative view of mysticism, offers no comprehensive overview of mystical traditions, and aims to initiate a dialogue, not to have the final word. I then respond to the foregoing essays by the five critics
Epistemology · Mysticism · Theology · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |