Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Conditionality of Hypothetical Imperatives

Datos Bibliográficos

ID20510660
AutoresJamsheed Siyar (College of Wooster, autor de correspondencia)
Año2013
Volumen18
Número3
Páginas439-460
Fecha de publicación2013-11-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaKantian Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1369-4154 • E-ISSN: 2044-2394
EditorialCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1369415413000186
OpenAlexW2168823355
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas24

Kant famously distinguishes between the categorical imperative (CI) – the fundamental principle of morality – and hypothetical imperatives (HIs), which are instrumental norms. On the standard reading, Kant subscribes to the ‘disjunctive reading’ of HIs, which takes HIs to be consistency requirements that bind agents in exactly the same way whether or not agents are subject to CI and whether or not they conform their choices to CI. I argue that this reading cannot be squared with Kant's account of an agent's disposition, in particular his claim that cognition of CI is a necessary condition of willing a maxim. I further argue that Kant could not accept an account of HIs as consistency requirements. Finally, I outline Kant's conception of HIs as non-disjunctive requirements that arise when and only when agents will permissible ends. This account can help recapture Kant's conception of the unity of rational norms

Categorical imperative · Conditionality · Disposition · Epistemology · Linguistics · Maxim · Morality · Political science · Computer Science · Free Will and Agency · Law · Mathematics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • The Practice of Moral Judgment

    Barbara Herman•The Practice of Moral Judgment•1996

  • Kant: Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Robert Merrihew Adams et al.•Kant : Religion Within the…•1998

  • Kant's Theory of Freedom

    Open Access•Henry E Allison•Kant's Theory of Freedom•1990

  • Kant

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Roger J Sullivan et al.•Kant•1996

  • Groundwork of The Metaphysic of Morals

    Immanuel Kant•Immanuel Kant•2020

  • The metaphysics of morals (1797)

    Immanuel Kant, Allen W Wood et al.•Practical Philosophy•2012

  • Kant's Ethical Thought

    Open Access•Allen W Wood•Kant's Ethical Thought•1999

  • Morality as Freedom

    Christine M Korsgaard•Kant's Practical Philosophy…•1989

  • The Scope of Instrumental Reason

    Open Access•Mark Schroeder•Philosophical Perspectives•2004

  • The Hypothetical Imperative

    Thomas E Hill•The Philosophical Review•1973

  • The hypothetical imperative

    Mark Schroeder•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•2005

  • Kant’s Theory of Practical Reason

    Thomas E Hill, Thomas E Hill Thomas E Hill et al.•The Monist•1989

  • Normative Requirements

    Open Access•John Broome•Ratio•1999

  • Critique of Practical Reason (Hackett Classics Series)

    Immanuel Kant, Werner S Pluhar•Critique of Practical Reason…•2002

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae