Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bird on Kant's Mathematical Antinomies

Bibliographic Data

ID20510786
AuthorsA W Moore (0000-0002-3213-923X, St. John's College, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume16
Issue2
Pages235-243
Publication date2011-06-16
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueKantian Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-4154 • E-ISSN: 2044-2394
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1369415411000094
OpenAlexW2072876404
LanguageEN
References cited6

The interpretation of Kant's Critical philosophy as a version of traditional idealism has a long history. In spite of Kant's and his commentators’ various attempts to distinguish between traditional and transcendental idealism, his philosophy continues to be construed as committed (whether explicitly or implicitly and whether consistently or inconsistently) to various features usually associated with the traditional idealist project. As a result, most often, the accusation is that his Critical philosophy makes too strong metaphysical and epistemological claims. In his The Revolutionary Kant , Graham Bird engages in a systematic and thorough evaluation of the traditionalist interpretation, as part of perhaps the most comprehensive and compelling defence of a revolutionary reading of Kant's thought. In the third part of this special issue, the exchanges between, on the one hand, Graham Bird and, on the other, Gary Banham, Gordon Brittan, Manfred Kuehn, Adrian Moore and Kenneth Westphal focus on specific aspects of Bird's interpretation of Kant's first Critique. More exactly, the emphasis is on specific aspects of Bird's interpretation of the Introduction, Analytic of Principles and Transcendental Dialectic of Kant's first Critique. The second part of the special issue is devoted to discussions of particular topics in Bird's construal of the remaining significant parts of the first Critique, namely, of the Transcendental Aesthetic and the Analytic of Concepts. Written by Sorin Baiasu and Michelle Grier, these articles examine specific issues in these two remaining parts of the Critique, from the perspective of the debate between the traditionalist and revolutionary interpretation. The special issue begins with an Introduction by the guest co-editors. This provides a summary of the exchanges between Bird and his critics, with a particular focus on the debates stemming from the differences between traditional and revolutionary interpretations of Kant

Critical philosophy · Dialectic · Epistemology · Idealism · Metaphysics · Skepticism · Transcendental idealism · Transcendental number · Transcendental philosophy · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications

  • Critique of Pure Reason

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Paul Guyer et al.•Critique of Pure Reason•1998

  • Critique of the Power of Judgment

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Paul Guyer et al.•Critique of the Power of Judgment•2000

  • Prolegomena to any future metaphysics that will be able to come forward as science (1783)

    Immanuel Kant, Henry E Allison et al.•Theoretical Philosophy After 1781•2009

  • The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics

    Open Access•A W Moore•Evolution of Modern Metaphysics•2011

  • A Note on Kant's First Antinomy

    A W Moore•The Philosophical Quarterly•1992

  • The Bounds of Sense

    P F Strawson, Peter Strawson•Bounds of Sense•2018

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae