Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Revisiting the Proof-Structure of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction

Bibliographic Data

ID20510907
AuthorsHyoung Sung Kim (Stanford University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume28
Issue1
Pages81-103
Publication date2023-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueKantian Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-4154 • E-ISSN: 2044-2394
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1369415422000449
OpenAlexW4309269396
LanguageEN
References cited25

There is no consensus concerning how to understand the ‘two-step proof structure’ (§§15–20, 21–7) of the Transcendental Deduction in the B-edition of the Critique of Pure Reason . This disagreement invites a closer examination of what Kant might have meant by a ‘transcendental deduction’. I argue that the transcendental deduction consists of three tasks that parallel Kant’s broader project of a ‘critique’ of pure reason; first, an origin task to justify reason’s authority to use them; second, an analytical task that determines the conditions under which this authority can be legitimately exercised; and third, a dialectical task to determine the conditions under which this authority cannot be legitimately exercised. So long as we continue to read the B-Deduction solely in terms of its two-step proof structure, we overlook how Kant’s notion of ‘critique’ constitutes the real grounds for his argumentative strategy there

Argumentative · Dialectic · Epistemology · Transcendental number · Transcendental philosophy · Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • Kantian Nonconceptualism

    Open Access•Dennis Schulting•Kantian Nonconceptualism•2016

  • Kant, Non-Conceptual Content and the Representation of Space

    Lucy Allais•Journal of the history of…•2009

  • Kant on limits, boundaries, and the positive function of ideas

    Open Access•Stephen Howard•European Journal of Philosophy•2022

  • Is Kant's Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose

    Open Access•Anil Gomes•Kantian Review•2010

  • Kant’s Transcendental Idealism and his Transcendental Deduction

    Open Access•Justin B Shaddock•Kantian Review•2015

  • Kant on the Transcendental Deduction of Space and Time

    Open Access•Michele Merritt, Melissa McBay Merritt•Kantian Review•2010

  • Kant and the Capacity to Judge

    Béatrice Longuenesse, Charles T Wolfe•Kant and the Capacity to Judge•1998

  • Space as Form of Intuition and as Formal Intuition

    Christian Onof, Dennis Schulting•The Philosophical Review•2015

  • Kant's Transcendental Deduction

    Alison Laywine•Kant's Transcendental Deduction•2020

  • Kantis Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction

    Ian Proops•Journal of the history of…•2003

  • Two Kinds of Unity in the Critique of Pure Reason

    Colin Mclear•Journal of the history of…•2015

  • Kant's Transcendental Deduction

    Henry E Allison•Kant's Transcendental Deduction•2015

  • Laws of Nature and Causal Necessity

    Michael Friedman•Kant-Studien•2014

  • The Metaphysical Deduction and the Shadow of Humean Skepticism

    Markus Kohl•Kant-Studien•2018

  • Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument

    Karl Ameriks•Kant-Studien•1978

  • What Were Kant’s Aims in the Deduction

    Gary Hatfield•Philosophical Topics•2003

  • Kant on Perception

    Anil Gomes•The Philosophical Quarterly•2014

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae