Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Medical Referral for Abortion and Freedom of Conscience in Australian Law

Bibliographic Data

ID20511674
AuthorsJo-Anne Howe (The University of Adelaide), Joanne Howe, Suzanne Le Mire (The University of Adelaide)
Year2019
Volume34
Issue1
Pages85-112
Publication date2019-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Law and Religion (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0748-0814 • E-ISSN: 2163-3088
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/jlr.2019.14
OpenAlexW2955712556
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited24

This article examines legislative changes related to abortion regulation in Australia that create obligations of medical referral on practitioners who have a conscientious objection to abortion. Despite a significant Australian history of accepting secularized conscience claims, particularly in the field of military conscription, the limitation of conscience claims about abortion can be traced to a failure to appreciate the significant secular arguments that can be made to support such claims. We draw on arguments of plurality and pragmatism as capable of providing a firm foundation for legislative protections of freedom of conscience in the case of medical referral for abortion. These justifications are not dependent on religious grounds, and therefore they have the potential to be relevant and persuasive in a secular society such as Australia. Acceptance of a pluralistic argument in favor of freedom of conscience is a powerful commitment to the creation of a society that values human autonomy and a diversity of opinion. It sits comfortably with the democratic values that are enshrined in the Australian political system and institutions. It avoids the potential damage to the individual that may be wrought when conscience is overridden by state compulsion

Abortion · Autonomy · Conscience · Conscientious objector · Legislature · Political science · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Law · Medicine · Reproductive Health and Contraception

  • Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes

    Nathan Emmerich•Journal of Medical Ethics•2023

  • Conscience, Law and the State

    Open Access•Hugh Smith•Australian Journal of Politics &…•1989

  • Christian concerns about an Australian Charter of Rights

    Patrick Parkinson•Australian Journal of Human Rights•2010

  • The Legal and Factual Status of Abortion in Australia

    Open Access•Ronli Sifris•Alternative Law Journal•2013

  • Abortion as a Human Right--International and Regional Standards

    Christina Zampas, Jaime M Gher•Human Rights Law Review•2008

  • Medical abortion in Australia

    Barbara Baird•Reproductive Health Matters•2015

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae