Dams, Freeways and Aerospace

Australian environmentalists have confidently staked a claim to leading roles in both activism at a global scale and in bringing transnational ideas to bear, successfully, on local environmental issues. Amongst these successes, World Heritage listing for south‐west Tasmania stands out. But failures to comprehend Australia's metropolitan character and slowness in accepting Aboriginal rights to land meant that environmentalists have not made much use of this global recognition. In that light, the heroic self‐image of environmental movements, 1964–84, deserves reconsideration. The activities considered here were all, in one way or another, reactions to a rapid industrial modernising of post‐war Australia. Iconic events, the formation of the Australian Conservation Foundation, the struggle over south‐west Tasmania and Green Bans in Sydney and Melbourne remained local in objectives and ideas. In contrast the anti‐Concorde campaign was integrated into a transnational protest movement. Yet it is overlooked in adulatory histories of Australian environmentalism. In reacting to a modernising Australia, environmentalists took up some transnational ideas and responded positively to mediators in their transmission. In the long run, however, a limited acceptance of transnational expertise, especially as regards cultural heritage and urbanism, calls into question the self‐ascribed vanguard role of Australian environmental movements

Archaeology · Environmental ethics · Environmental movement · Environmentalism · Geography · Political science · Politics · Temporalities · Transnationalism · Vanguard · American Environmental and Regional History · Australian History and Society · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · History · Law

• The politics of repressing environmentalists as agents of foreign influence

  Miriam Matejova, Stefan Michael Parker et al.•Australian Journal Of International…•2018

  Add to list