Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Influence of the Crown in the Evolution of Responsible Government

Bibliographic Data

ID20612113
AuthorsKate Martin (0000-0001-5230-221X, corresponding author), K L P Martin
Year1922
Volume3
Issue4
Pages334-342
Publication date1922-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCanadian Historical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0008-3755 • E-ISSN: 1710-1093
PublisherUniversity of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3138/chr-03-04-03
OpenAlexW1986191724
LanguageEN
Citations received1

HE Durham Report will always remain a turning point inBritish colonial policy.In its recommendations lay the genesis of responsible government.The ultimate wisdom of that policy is not now doubted, but at the time it met with considerable opposition and misunderstanding, even in comparatively Liberal quarters in England.In Canada its complete realization was not secured until ten years after the publication of the Report.The years between 1839-1849 are, therefore, of considerable importance in Canadian history.The evolution from representative to responsible government meant ten years of bitter contention and party controversy.The struggle was not so much whether or not Canada was to enjoy responsible government, but what interpretation of that theory was to hold the field.The four governors of that period, $ydenham, Bagot, Metcalfe, and Elgin, as well as the leaders of the Canadian Reform party, all agreed that they were following the principles enunciated in the Durham Report, but they all differed when they considered how those principles were to be put into practice.This fact is on the surface peculiar when it is remembered that the language of the Durham Report is remarkably clear and dogmatic in tone, quite unlike the usual blue book, and contains none of the reservations and ambiguities which are natural to the discreet politician.What is the explanation?Professor Morison, in a recent book, 1 traces the evolution of Canadian self-government during this period.Brilliant and suggestive as the book is, he nevertheless fails to reconcile the difference between the conception of responsible government as understood by Metcalfe and by Elgin.He is inclined to emphasize the limitations imposed by Durham. 2 He argues with effect that Metcalfe was quite right in claiming that he

Crown (dentistry) · Government (linguistics) · Linguistics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Legal principles and applications · Materials Science · Philosophy

  • Province and nation

    Philip Goldring•The Journal of Imperial &…•1980

Citations per year0.02
Citation span1980 - 1980 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae