Measurement invariance in the social sciences: Historical development, methodological challenges, state of the art, and future perspectives

Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) P. Schmidt , Eldad Davidov , Maksim Rudnev , Dorothée Behr , Katharina Meitinger , Natalja Menold , Daniel Seddig , Suzanne Jak , Heinz Leitgöb , Tihomir Asparouhov , Kim De Roover , Bengt Muthén , Rens van de Schoot
ANO 2023
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Social Science Research
ISSN 0049-089X
E-ISSN 1096-0317
EDITORA University of Chicago Press (United States)
DOI 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102805
CITAÇÕES 3
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
In Search of a Comparable Measure of Generalized Individual Religiosity in the World Values Survey

(2024)

Do Different Devices Perform Equally Well with Different Numbers of Scale Points and Response Formats? A test of measurement invariance and reliability

(2024)

Evidence of Validity Does not Rule out Systematic Bias: A Commentary on Nomological Noise and Cross-Cultural Invariance

(2023)

Why Measurement Invariance is Important in Comparative Research. A Response to Welzel et al. (2021)

(2023)

Ferramentas

Acessar via DOI