Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Female family carers’ experiences of violent, abusive or harmful behaviour by the older person for whom they care

A case of epistemic injustice

Bibliographic Data

ID21058680
AuthorsLouise Isham (0000-0002-3660-1073, School of Nursing University of Birmingham Birmingham UK, corresponding author), Caroline Bradbury-Jones (0000-0002-5237-6777, University of Birmingham), Caroline Bradbury‐Jones (School of Nursing University of Birmingham Birmingham UK), Alistair Hewison (0000-0002-8508-1967, School of Nursing University of Birmingham Birmingham UK)
Year2020
Volume42
Issue1
Pages80-94
Publication date2020-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociology of Health & Illness (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0141-9889 • E-ISSN: 1467-9566
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1467-9566.12986
PMID31515820
OpenAlexW2969780161
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited45

Family carers affected by violent, abusive or harmful behaviour by the older person for whom they care face social and epistemic challenges in developing and sharing knowledge about their experiences. These difficulties have contributed to a situation in which there is a paucity of evidence and public discourse about how we understand violence and harm instigated by people who have care needs or are ‘vulnerable’. This paper reports the findings of a qualitative study that involved 12 in‐depth interviews with female carers affected by violence, abuse or harm. The study was informed theoretically by Miranda Fricker's concept of epistemic injustice which was used as a framework for analysis. There were two principal findings: (1) Carers were sensitive to anticipatory stigma and loss of moral autonomy. As a result, they self‐censured what they shared and, at times, were met with subtle but powerful processes of silencing. (2) Carers had limited linguistic and conceptual resources to explain the emotional and social aspects of the harm they experienced, exacerbated by implicit social norms about the ‘private’ and gendered nature of familial care. To conclude, we discuss the implications of these findings for sociological research and health and social care practice

Abusive relationship · Autonomy · Criminology · Domestic violence · Harm · Injustice · Poison control · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Suicide prevention · Employment and Welfare Studies · Homelessness and Social Issues · Medicine · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • How does Carer’s Allowance in the UK construct family carers? History and recent developments

    Open Access•Jackie Gulland•International Journal of Care and…•2023

  • Institutional, humane, therapeutic

    Open Access•Liina Sointu•Sociology of Health & Illness•2025

  • Using the concept of epistemic injustice and cultural humility for understanding why and how social work curricular might be decolonized

    Open Access•Ann Anka•Social Work Education•2024

  • The unheard path

    Open Access•Fred Cooper•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2026

  • We Live in the Shadows”

    Open Access•Cara Jardine, Briege Nugent•Feminist Criminology•2026

  • You’d think they’d know’

    Open Access•Brian Brown•Social Theory & Health•2021

  • Older women and domestic abuse

    Open Access•Alisoun Milne•The Journal of Adult Protection•2023

  • Carers and domestic abuse – the elephant in the room

    Open Access•Amanda Warburton-Wynn•The Journal of Adult Protection•2022

  • Safeguarding carers

    Open Access•Ann Anka, Bridget Penhale•The Journal of Adult Protection•2024

  • Carer harm

    Open Access•Simon Donnelly, Louise Isham et al.•The Journal of Adult Protection•2025

  • A qualitative study about how unpaid family carers who are at risk of abuse are supported through safeguarding carers processes in England

    Open Access•Ann Anka•The Journal of Adult Protection•2025

  • This is Still All about Love’

    Open Access•Louise Isham, Caroline Bradbury-Jones et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2021

  • Exploring unintentional ‘carer harm’—Insights from family carers and professionals

    Open Access•Simon Donnelly, Alisoun Milne et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2025

  • Home-making at the margins

    Open Access•Anne Power, Andrew Power et al.•Geoforum•2026

  • A sense of injustice in care networks

    Open Access•Aldiene Henrieke Hengelaar, Petra Verdonk et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2024

  • Care in everyday life

    Open Access•Marian Barnes•Care in Everyday Life•2012

  • Elder Abuse

    Karl Pillemer, David Burnes et al.•The Gerontologist•2016

  • Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults

    Martin Pinquart, Sheiva Sorensen•Psychology and Aging•2011

  • The Ethics of Care, Dependence, and Disability

    Open Access•Eva Feder Kittay•Ratio Juris•2011

  • The social construction of reality

    Peter L Luckmann Thomas A Berger, David Colacci et al.•The social construction of reality•1967

  • Culpability for Epistemic Injustice

    Wayne D Riggs, Wayne Riggs•Social Epistemology•2012

  • Overview

    Vivien Burr•Social Constructionism, Discourse…•1998

  • Epistemic Injustice and Illness

    Open Access•Ian James Kidd, Havi Carel•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2016

  • The Epistemology of Resistance

    José Medina•The epistemology of resistance•2013

  • When Older People Are Violent or Abusive Toward Their Family Caregiver

    Open Access•Louise Isham, Alistair Hewison et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2019

  • Carer‐related research and knowledge

    Open Access•MARY LARKIN, Melanie Henwood et al.•Health & Social Care in the…•2019

  • Choosing to Live with Harm? A Presentation of two Case Studies to Explore the Perspective of those who Experienced Adult Safeguarding Interventions

    Kathryn Mackay•Ethics and Social Welfare•2017

  • Defining the “perpetrator”

    Open Access•Josie Dixon, Simon Bigg et al.•The Journal of Adult Protection•2013

  • Putting people at the centre

    Open Access•Louise Butler, Jill Manthorpe•The Journal of Adult Protection•2016

  • Domestic abuse and older people

    Open Access•Sarah Wydall, Rebecca Zerk•The Journal of Adult Protection•2017

  • Reflections on engaging with an advisory network in the context of a ‘sensitive’ research study

    Louise Isham, Caroline Bradbury-Jones et al.•International Journal of Social…•2018

  • Broadening constructions of family violence

    Open Access•Debra Jackson•Child & Family Social Work•2003

  • Pathologizing behavior

    Open Access•Sherry L Dupui, Elaine Wiersma et al.•Journal of Aging Studies•2012

  • Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing

    Open Access•Kristie Dotson•Hypatia•2011

  • Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice

    Open Access•Gaile Pohlhaus•Hypatia•2011

  • Re-Thinking Harm and Abuse

    Brigid Daniel, Alison Bowes•The British Journal of Social Work•2011

  • Modern history of child sexual abuse awareness

    Open Access•Erna Olafson, David L Corwin et al.•Child Abuse & Neglect•1993

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Dependence, independence or inter-dependence? Revisiting the concepts of 'care' and 'dependency

    Open Access•Michael Fine, Caroline Glendinning•Ageing and Society•2005

  • Putting responsive behaviours in place

    Open Access•Rachel V Herron, Meghan Wrathall et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2018

  • Unpaid caregiving and paid work over life-courses

    Open Access•Fiona Carmichael, Marco G Ercolani•Social Science & Medicine•2016

  • Love Labour as a Distinct and Non-Commodifiable Form of Care Labour

    Open Access•Kathleen Lynch, Kathleen S Lynch•The Sociological Review•2007

  • Researching sensitive topics

    Open Access•Virginia Dickson-Swift, Erica L James et al.•Qualitative Research•2009

  • The Impact of Lifelong Exposure to IPV on Adult Children and Their Aging Parents

    Open Access•Tova Band-Winterstein, Tova Band‐Winterstein•Journal of Family Issues•2014

Unique citing works15
Citations per year3
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae