Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Revisiting Chinese indefinite subjects – a comparison with English

Bibliographic Data

ID21064563
AuthorsJennifer Shuiying Yao (0000-0002-6259-1155, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Publication date2026-06-24
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Linguistic Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0167-6318 • E-ISSN: 1613-3676
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/tlr-2025-0004
OpenAlexW7165622884
LanguageEN
References cited17

This paper defines the necessary and sufficient conditions for the licitness of indefinite subjects in Mandarin Chinese. The primary thesis is that their distribution is governed by two distinct but interacting principles. First, we posit, drawing upon Chierchia (1995. Individual-level predicates as inherent generics. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (eds.), The generic book , 176–223. University of Chicago Press), that Davidsonian arguments – both in stage-level and individual-level predicates, can be formally constrained to function as existential stage topics or generic situation topics. The presence of such a topic can license an indefinite subject, satisfying the discourse requirement for a sentence to have a topic as its starting point. Second, we further argue that the felicity of a Chinese indefinite subject also depends on a legitimate topic-comment structure, as defined by the topic- licensing condition from Pan and Hu (2008. A semantic–pragmatic interface account of (dangling) topics in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics 40(11)). This condition requires a non-null intersection between the sets denoted by the topic and the comment. The well-formedness of a Chinese indefinite subject is thus shown to be contingent not only upon the availability of a suitable discourse topic but also upon the licit semantic integration of the topic-comment structure itself

Existentialism · Feature (linguistics) · Function (biology) · Intersection (aeronautics) · Mandarin Chinese · Pragmatics · Sentence · Subject (documents) · Syntax · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Structuring Sense Volume I

    Hagit Borer•In name only•2005

  • Mandarin Chinese

    Li Thompson, Charles N Li et al.•Mandarin Chinese•1981

  • The Logical Form of Action Sentences

    Donald Davidson•The Logic of Decision and Action•1967

  • On Subject Specificity and Theory of Syntax-Semantics Interface

    Open Access•Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•2001

  • Topic-Comment Structure and the Contrast Between Stage Level and Individual Level Predicates

    Gerhard Jäger•Journal of Semantics•2001

  • Exhaustivity and bare numeral phrases in Mandarin

    Open Access•Cheng-Yu Edwin Tsai•Language and Linguistics 語言暨語言學•2021

  • Generic Sentences and Analyticity

    Noel Burton-Roberts•Studies in Language•1977

  • Is there a finite vs. nonfinite distinction in Chinese

    Open Access•Jianhua Hu, Haihua Pan et al.•Linguistics•2001

  • Argument Determiner Phrases and Number Phrases

    P Li, Yen-Hui Audrey Li•Linguistic Inquiry•1998

  • A semantic-pragmatic interface account of (dangling) topics in Mandarin Chinese

    Open Access•Haihua Pan, Jianhua Hu•Journal of Pragmatics•2008

  • The Spanish copulas as aspectual indicators

    Open Access•Marta Lujan•Lingua•1981

  • A Discourse-Based Account of Spanish ser/estar

    Open Access•Claudia Maienborn•Linguistics•2005

  • Tense anchoring in Chinese

    Open Access•Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai•Lingua•2008

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae