Modernization and Role-Expansion of the Military in Developing Countries
A Comparative Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2106705 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Moshe Lissak (Hebrew University of Jerusalem, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1967 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 233-255 |
| Publication date | 1967-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Studies in Society and History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0010-4175 • E-ISSN: 1475-2999 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0010417500004503 |
| OpenAlex | W2073045746 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 16 |
Officers in active military service engaged in administrative tasks in the civil service, in the management of economic enterprises, in farming estates, teaching, bank management and other 'civilian' tasks are not an unusual phenomenon in countries where the military is the exclusive ruler, or a direct and active partner in the government. The number of officers in this category is increasing also in those countries where the military is only a latent and unofficial partner in the regulation of the different sectors of political, economic and social power. However, even in countries where it is excluded from power, the military as an organization (as opposed to individual officers) takes charge of services which in Western countries are regarded as the domain of the civilian administration, or of other civilian bodies. This issue has received only partial and incidental treatment in the literature devoted to the subject of modernization. The 'infiltration' of various military branches into different sectors of society is generally explained, if the issue arises at all, in terms of the conflict preceding the coup, or through other political events. Although this method of explanation is perfectly legitimate, it does narrow the discussion to the political sphere. This results in the neglect of highly significant material for the analysis of what may be termed 'improvised' processes of modernization and nation-building. 'Improvisation', in this context, means the utilization of unorthodox means and routes to accelerate the modernization process. Infiltration and usurpation of non-military roles by officers is a case in point, although one should acknowledge that modernization is not always desired by the 'infiltrators
Civil–military relations · Economic growth · Economics · Improvisation · Modernization theory · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Law · Military History and Strategy · Peacebuilding and International Security
The military in development
The Study of War and the Military in Israel
Bibliographic Essay on the Role of the Military in African States
Military, State, and Society in Israel
Center and periphery in developing countries and prototypes of military elites
Politics in the Post-Military State
The Israeli Army in Politics
Organizational Participation and Public Policy
Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia
The Emerging Nations
The Military Affairs Committee and Party Control of the Military in China
Civil-Military Relations in Europe and the United States
The Emerging Nations
Tradition, Values, and Socio-Economic Development
Social Change, Mobilization, and Exchange of Services between the Military Establishment and the Civil Society
Sociological Aspects of Political Development in Underdeveloped Countries
Religion and Politics in Pakistan
Pakistan's Preventive Autocracy and Its Causes
The Political Role of Pakistan's Civil Service
The End of the Indonesian Rebellion
The Political Role of the Army in Indonesia
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,14 |
| Citation span | 1968 - 2018 (51) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |