“I Didn’t Even Know This Was a Thing”
College Athletes’ Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Potential Employee Status
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21067864 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Molly Harry (0000-0003-2029-0394, University of Florida, corresponding author), Sydney Hammit (Southern Methodist University), John Wolohan (Syracuse University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Sport and Social Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0193-7235 • E-ISSN: 1552-7638 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/01937235261464484 |
| OpenAlex | W7167501679 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 21 |
College athletics is experiencing rapid changes, prompting myriad proposed reform models, with one of the most prominent being the potential reclassification of college athletes from students to employees. Through the lens of amateur and commercial logics, we surveyed Power Four college athletes on their knowledge of and attitudes toward potential employee status. Results revealed that athletes held limited knowledge of employment, often depending on informal resources outside of their athletic departments, highlighting uneven access to information within a system in which athletes are central stakeholders yet remain peripheral to decision-making processes. Still, athletes’ attitudes toward employment leaned more positive, despite expressing conflicting attitudes on what employment would mean for sport offerings and potential loss of scholarship, reflecting tensions between labor-based understandings of participation and longstanding institutional narratives of education and amateurism. Similarly, athletes were uncertain or negative toward unionization and striking, suggesting ambivalence toward collective labor action within a context where athlete rights have long been constrained. Findings extend sport labor scholarship by showing how perceptions of “employee” are situated within broader structures of power and institutional control, with implications for how sport leaders and stakeholders engage athlete voice and rights in this evolving landscape
Action (physics) · Amateur · Ambivalence · Athletes · Context (archaeology) · Perception · Power (physics) · Scholarship · Sport and Mega-Event Impacts · Sport Psychology and Performance · Sports, Gender, and Society
You Don’t Want Us to Solve This”
This Isn’t Just About Us”
Hegemony and the National Collegiate Athletic Association
Should College Athletes Be Allowed to Be Paid? A Public Opinion Analysis
The Institutional Logics Perspective
Player to Influencer? College Athletes’ Roles and Identities in the Context of Name, Image, and Likeness
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |