Visual Humor through Internet Memes (II) From harmless humour to the discriminatory potential of (anti)memes. Case Study

“The Transgender Bathroom Debate”

Bibliographic Data

ID21070652
AuthorsMinodora Sălcudean (0000-0002-1192-0617, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, corresponding author)
Year2020
Pages94-100
Publication date2020-12-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTransilvania (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0255-0539 • E-ISSN: 3061-2217
PublisherASTRA National Museum Complex (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.51391/trva.2020.12.12
OpenAlexW3120048791
LanguageEN
References cited21

After pointing out - in the first part of this study - the persuasive quality of memes, once they are created, re-mixed and shared publicly, we attempt to further analyze and discuss the social and ethical implications of this type of humour, meant for mainstream entertainment and specific to the digital era, while insisting on the relevance of its reception; when the derision hides, in fact, hostility, the use of humour can affect the image of vulnerable groups and can contribute to the exclusion of their members. The attached case study presents and analyses anti-trans memes created and shared during a notorious legislative episode in the United States, referring to the use of gender-inclusive public restrooms. This episode has provoked controversies in the American public space and has served as a new reason for discriminatory manifestations online, using internet memes

Aesthetics · Art · Entertainment · Hostility · Internet privacy · Legislature · Mainstream · Media studies · Ostracism · Political science · Sociology · Transgender · Computer Science · Gender Studies · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Humor Studies and Applications · Law · Media, Gender, and Advertising · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access