Face to Face, Side by Side

Should the Mediterranean be seen as “face‐to‐face” (i.e. confrontational) or “side‐by‐side” (i.e. fraternal)? How this question has been answered has had far‐reaching effects both in the human sciences and in terms of actual social relations—and the former has had massive implications on the latter through its influencing of policy‐makers, politicians, the media, and thus public opinion. This article attempts to look at two interrelated processes: the historiography of looking at the Mediterranean, and actual political discourse and practice, within the overall context of actual social interactions across the region. It begins by examining two paradigms in looking at the Mediterranean: The Paradigm of Discord, and the Paradigm of Utopias of Harmony. The article then examines alternative paradigms—those of Utopias of Harmony tracing their evolution from nineteenth‐century Saint‐Simonians to Albert Camus. It then attempts to show that both approaches suffer from grievous flaws. The article concludes by seeking inspiration from Raymond Aron’s characterization of different types of peace. The peace that is being pursued by the European Union can be seen as a “Hegemonic Peace” and this is problematical. Finally it explores two different hypothetical scenarios for future relations in the Mediterranean

Aesthetics · Art · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Hegemony · Historiography · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Social science · Sociology · History · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions

• De Beyrouth à Alger

  Robert Ilbert•Vingtième Siècle Revue d histoire•1991

  Add to list