Difference in Memory
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2108368 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mahua Sarkar (Binghamton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 139-168 |
| Publication date | 2006-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Studies in Society and History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0010-4175 • E-ISSN: 1475-2999 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0010417506000065 |
| OpenAlex | W2122338973 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
The study of popular memory is necessarily relational. It involves the exploration of two sets of relations: (1) that between dominant memory and oppositional forms across the public field, including academic productions; and (2) the relation between public discourse and a more privatized sense of the past generated within lived culture.2 This paper is concerned with the second of these two constitutive relations in the study of popular memory-the often vexed but close linkages between public constructions and private reminiscences
Epistemology · Field (mathematics) · Pure mathematics · Relation (database) · Sociology · Computer Science · Mathematics · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Philosophy · Psychology · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,31 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2026 (17) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |