Food systems policy coherence

A ten-country assessment

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21085045
AutoresStella Nordhagen (0000-0002-3801-3769, Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition, autor de correspondencia), Mahamadou Tankari (Cheikh Anta Diop University), Jamie Morrison (Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition), Julie Collins (0000-0002-4018-0101, University of America), Kelly Parsons (0000-0002-6473-210X, University of Cambridge), Donald Resnick (0000-0001-6285-3461, International Food Policy Research Institute), José Valls Bedeau (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations)
Año2026
Volumen142
Páginas103113
Fecha de publicación2026-08-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaFood Policy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0306-9192 • E-ISSN: 1873-5657
EditorialElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.foodpol.2026.103113
OpenAlexW7165195171
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas54

Policy coherence is widely recognised as essential for achieving food systems transformation, but attempts to assess food systems policy coherence have been limited to date in terms of their scope of topics and geographies and lack of comparable methods. This paper introduces the Food Systems Policy Coherence (FSPC) Diagnostic Tool and uses it to analyse food systems policy coherence across 10 low- and middle-income countries in Africa and Asia through key informant interviews (n = 189) and review of policy documents (n = 808). The FSPC Diagnostic Tool considers two aspects of policy coherence: (1) the structures and mechanisms that may contribute to achieving stronger policy process coherence and (2) coherence between policies from six sectors and ten common food systems goals. Regarding the former, all countries analysed had strong framework documents for cross-sectoral food policy, backed by high-level political commitment, but they tended to be much weaker when it came to capacity for implementation and especially monitoring and accountability. Policy coherence across sectors was generally strong for the goals of climate change adaptation and social protection but weaker for goals of healthy diets for all, adequate wages for food system workers, and climate change mitigation through food systems. Trade policy was the policy area with the greatest incoherence with a diverse range of food systems goals. The results offer the most comprehensive analysis of food systems policy coherence to date. The tool makes a useful contribution to measuring policy coherence and can serve as both a foundation for future research and enhance accountability for achieving coherent policy outcomes

Accountability · Adaptation (eye) · Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy) · Food policy · Food systems · Policy analysis · Politics · Scope (computer science) · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Child Nutrition and Water Access