Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Population Politics' at the End of Empire

Migration and Sovereignty in Ottoman Eastern Rumelia, 1877-1886

Bibliographic Data

ID2108803
AuthorsAnna M Mirkova (Old Dominion University, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume55
Issue4
Pages955-985
Publication date2013-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueComparative Studies in Society and History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0010-4175 • E-ISSN: 1475-2999
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0010417513000479
OpenAlexW2012340849
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited19

This article explores the migrations of Turkish Muslims after the 1878 Peace Treaty of Berlin, which severed much of the Balkans from the Ottoman Empire as fully independent nation-states or as nominally dependent polities in the borderlands of the empire. I focus on one such polity-the administratively autonomous Ottoman province of Eastern Rumelia-which, in wrestling to reconcile liberal principles of equality and political representation understood in ethno-religious terms, prompted emigration of Turkish Muslims while enabling Bulgarian Christian hegemony. Scholars have studied Muslim emigration from the Balkans as the Ottoman Empire gradually lost hold of the region, emphasizing deleterious effects of nationalism and aggressive state-building in the region. Here I look at migration at empire's end, and more specifically at the management of migration as constitutive of sovereignty. The Ottoman government asserted its suzerainty by claiming to protect the rights of Eastern Rumelia's Muslims. The Bulgarian dominated administration of Eastern Rumelia claimed not only administrative but also political autonomy by trying to contain the grievances of Turkish Muslims as a domestic issue abused by ill-meaning outsiders, all the while insisting that the province protected the rights of all subjects. Ultimately, a 'corporatist' model of subjecthood obtained in Eastern Rumelia, which fused the traditional religious categorization of Ottoman subjects with an ethnic one under the umbrella of representative government. The tension between group belonging and individual politicization that began unfolding in Eastern Rumelia became a major dilemma of the post-Ottoman world and other post-imperial societies after World War I

Empire · Hegemony · Nationalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Polity · Population · Sociology · Sovereignty · State (computer science) · Balkans: History, Politics, Society · Law · Soviet and Russian History · Turkey's Politics and Society

  • Devlete İnanmak

    Open Access•İhsan Sefa Özer, V Gül Cephanecigil•Divan Disiplinlerarası Çalışmalar…•2025

  • Ethnicity and the Colonial State

    Open Access•Alexander Keese•Ethnicity and the colonial state•2015

  • From Masada to Sarikamis

    Open Access•Tarik Basbugoglu, Neil Bar et al.•Nations and Nationalism•2025

  • The standard of "civilization" in international society

    Gerrit W Gong•The standard of "civilization" in…•1984

  • Rambling Recollections

    A D Rockwell•The American Journal of the…•1920

  • Reform in the Ottoman Empire, 1856-1876

    Roderic H Davison, Roderic H Davıson•Reform in the Ottoman Empire,…•1964

  • The Well-Protected Domains

    Selim Deringil•The Well-Protected Domains•2011

  • Tsarist Russia and Balkan Nationalism

    Charles Jelavich•Tsarist Russia and Balkan…•1958

  • Imagining the Balkans

    Maria Todorova, Marii︠a︡ Nikolaeva Todorova•Imagining the Balkans•2009

  • From International Law to Imperial Constitutions

    Open Access•Lauren Benton•Law and History Review•2008

  • Russia and Panslavism in the Eighteen-Seventies

    Open Access•B H Sumner•Transactions of the Royal…•1935

  • Tsarist Russia and Balkan Nationalism

    Serge A Zenkovsky, Charles Jelavich•The Slavic and East European…•1961

  • The standard of ‘civilization’ in international society

    Barrie Paskins•International Affairs•1984

  • Landholding and Commercial Agriculture in the Middle East

    Mohamed-Hedi Cherif, Çağlar Keyder et al.•Journal of the Economic and…•1994

  • The Great European Treaties of the Nineteenth Century

    Charles Seymour, Agustus Oakes et al.•The American Historical Review•1919

  • Landholding and Commercial Agriculture in the Middle East

    Fikret Adanir, Fikret Adanır et al.•Die Welt des Islams•1994

  • Face-to-Face

    Open Access•Yanni Kotsonis•Slavic Review•2004

  • Russian Ethnographers in the Service of Empire, 1856-1862

    Open Access•Catherine B Clay•Slavic Review•1995

  • Human Rights

    Open Access•Jack Donnelly•International Affairs•1998

  • No Place to Go

    Yanni Kotsonis•The Journal of Modern History•2004

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,27
Citation span2015 - 2025 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae