The Pulse in the Machine
Automating Tibetan Diagnostic Palpation in Postsocialist Russia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2108906 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tatiana Chudakova (0009-0007-0375-4990, Harvard University Press, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 407-434 |
| Publication date | 2015-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Studies in Society and History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0010-4175 • E-ISSN: 1475-2999 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0010417515000080 |
| OpenAlex | W2319529318 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 37 |
This article analyzes efforts by Soviet and present-day scientists in Russia to 'rationalize' and ultimately automate the diagnostic techniques of Tibetan medicine. It tracks the institutional and conceptual histories of designing a pulse diagnostic system, a project that began in the Soviet Union in the early 1980s. It has recently been re-enlivened in Buryatia, an ethnic minority region in Southeastern Siberia, in efforts to mobilize indigenous medical practices in response to local and national public health concerns. I focus on the translational ideologies that informed efforts to develop the pulsometer as a medical imaging technology, and analyze obstacles to these efforts found at the core of the device. Scientists working on the pulsometer have systematically tried to discern whether their measurements indicate sustained bodily pathologies, or instead reflect only technological white noise, and they still recruit and rely on the embodied expertise of practitioners of Tibetan medicine to validate their findings. In so doing they reaffirm claims that Tibetan medicine in Buryatia is inextricable from the forms of knowledge and practice that their projects work to standardize. I show how the apparent failures at perfect mechanization have made the pulsometer a surprisingly productive site for creating new kinds of expert communities and forms of knowledge making
Indigenous · Political science · Tibetan medicine · Traditional medicine · Work (physics) · Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies · Engineering · History of Science and Medicine · Medicine · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
The invention of modern science
Picturing Personhood
Biocapital
From Newspeak to Cyberspeak
The Disunity of science
The Postmodern Turn
Tibetan Medicine and Biomedicine
The cultivation of whiteness
Conceptualizing Feminist Strategies for Russian Reproductive Politics
Reading Hands
Randomized Controlled Crime
Science in Russia and the Soviet Union
Curing and Crippling
Cryptographic imagination
Randomized Controlled Crime
Dreamworld and catastrophe
Time Travels
Eighteenth-Century Wetware
Big Revolution, Little Revolution
Animation and Automation - The Liveliness and Labours of Bodies and Machines
The Evolution of Cyborg Consciousness
The Doctor and the Charlatan
The Expressiveness of the Body and the Divergence of Greek and Chinese Medicine
Epistemic Cultures
Somatic Modes of Attention
"Good" Manufacturing by Whose Standards? Remaking Concepts of Quality, Safety, and Value in the Production of Tibetan Medicines
Touching the gap
On spirit writing
What Was Life? Answers from Three Limit Biologies
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,36 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2020 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |