A Slippery Sovereignty
International Law and the Development of British Cochin
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2109285 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Devika Shankar (0000-0002-5462-7349, University of Hong Kong, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 820-844 |
| Publication date | 2022-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Studies in Society and History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0010-4175 • E-ISSN: 1475-2999 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0010417522000172 |
| OpenAlex | W4220674188 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 38 |
British Cochin was a port in southwestern India surrounded by princely states. This article uses a dispute surrounding its limits to interrogate the role international law played in generating novel forms of political claim-making among European and non-European powers at the turn of the twentieth century. Cochin was located in an area where both physical and political boundaries were hard to define. Situated at the tip of a narrow coastline surrounded by water, it was also lodged amid territories belonging to two princely states-Cochin State and Travancore. Its ever-shifting coastline and proximity to princely states forced colonial authorities to adopt a flexible approach to the port's boundaries, allowing the tiny princely state of Cochin to become progressively more involved with the British port's development over the nineteenth century. The article starts by examining the forces that shaped these entanglements, and then explores a territorial dispute involving British Cochin to illuminate the ways in which, during the twentieth century's first quarter, both the colonial administration and the Cochin State deployed the language of international law to try to extend their powers over the port. By highlighting the Cochin State's partially successful attempts at claiming sovereignty over the waters surrounding the harbor in order to become involved with the development of a port in British India, this article shows how international law emerged as a site through which semi-sovereign territories began testing and even extending the limits of their sovereignty
Colonialism · Geography · International law · Political science · Politics · Port (circuit theory · Sovereign state · Sovereignty · State (computer science · United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea · Engineering · Global Maritime and Colonial Histories · International Maritime Law Issues · Law · Maritime Security and History
The Gentle Civilizer of Nations
The Princes of India in the Endgame of Empire, 1917–1947
A Local History of Global Capital
The Indian Princes and their States
Sovereignty, Property and Empire, 1500–2000
A Search for Sovereignty
The Development of Transport Facilities in Kerala
Unfinished Conquest
Building the Nation
Mysore modern
Jousting Over Jurisdiction
Fragmenting the Nation
International Law and the Precarity of Ottoman Sovereignty in Africa at the End of the Nineteenth Century
The Indian ‘Alsatia’
An international anomaly? Sovereignty, the League of Nations and India's princely geographies
China’s War on Smuggling
Smuggling India
Margins of the Market
Rage for Order
Re-visioning princely states in South Asian historiography
Imaginary Futures and Colonial Internationalisms
Empire and Legal Universalisms in the Eighteenth Century
Problems of Water-Boundary Definition
Malabar and the Portuguese; Being a History of the Relations of the Portuguese with Malabar from 1500 to 1663
Wet Ontologies, Fluid Spaces
Federating the Raj
Government of Paper
No country but the ocean
Frontier as Resource
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2024 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |