Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Robert E. Goodin
ANO 2002
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Journal of Social Policy
ISSN 0047-2794
E-ISSN 1469-7823
EDITORA Elsevier (Netherlands)
DOI 10.1017/s004727940200675x
CITAÇÕES 6
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 92bb946a43c2b36623c0b44d2687123d

Resumo

'Mutual obligation' is a deft political slogan. Morally, it evokes deep-seated intuitions about 'fair reciprocity' and the 'duty of fair play'. It seems an easy slide from those intuitions to 'mutual obligation' policies demanding work-for-the-dole. That slide is illegitimate, however. There are many different ways to structure mutual obligation. Workfare policies, such as the Howard government's 'Mutual Obligation Initiative' in Australia, pick out only one among many alternative regimes that would answer equally well to our root intuitions about 'fair reciprocity'. Other ways of structuring mutual obligations within social welfare policy are both more standard and more desirable.

Ferramentas