Security in Pension Provision
A Critical Analysis of UK Government Policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2114730 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Patrick John Ring, Patrick Ring (0000-0003-4451-9480, Glasgow Caledonian University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 343-363 |
| Publication date | 2005-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Social Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-2794 • E-ISSN: 1469-7823 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0047279405008810 |
| OpenAlex | W2169007108 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
The Labour government has often argued that it is attempting to find a 'third way' in politics, appearing to take its inspiration from Anthony Giddens and, in relation to Labour's pensions policy, Giddens' notion of 'positive welfare'.Noting that the government maintains that 'pensions are all about security', and that it has declared the importance of this position throughout its reform of UK pension provision, this article critically examines the nature of the 'security' its reform is likely to deliver. Using the work of Giddens, it notes the importance of the concept of ontological security, and the relevance of trust to security. From this basis, and drawing upon the work of both Giddens and Niklas Luhmann, it goes on to consider whether the government's reforms of the three pillars of pension provision in the UK - state provision, occupational provision and personal provision - are capable of delivering greater security in pension provision.It concludes that, quite apart from the potential criticisms of the conception of positive welfare itself, the government's apparent adoption of such an approach has failed to appreciate adequately the importance of ontological security to any understanding of welfare. As a consequence, it is suggested that the practical outcome is reform that is likely to create much less security in pension provision than either Giddens' approach, or indeed regular government pronouncements, might suggest
Critical security studies · Economics · Government (linguistics) · Law and economics · Market economy · Network security policy · Pension · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Relevance (law) · Social security · Sociology · Welfare · Welfare reform · Welfare state · Work (physics) · Finance · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Climate change, Hans Jonas and indirect investors1
Women's pensions in the European Union and the current economic crisis
Insecure Housing and the Ongoing Search for Ontological Security
Pursuing security
Charity or Entitlement? Generational Habitus and the Welfare State among Older People in North‐east England
I Might not Live That Long!’ A Study of Young Women's Pension Planning in the UK
Getting Citizens to Save
Pension Confusion, Uncertainty and Trust in Scotland
Putting 'The Grave' into Social Policy
Remembering and Rethinking the Social Divisions of Welfare
I Wish to be Self-Reliant
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,58 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2022 (16) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |