Back to basics
Governing antibacterial resistance by means of mundane technoscience and accountability relations in a context of risk
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21149014 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fredrik Bragesjö (University of Gothenburg, corresponding author), Margareta Hallberg (University of Gothenburg) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 7-8 |
| Pages | 691-709 |
| Publication date | 2011-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Risk & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1369-8575 • E-ISSN: 1469-8331 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13698575.2011.624592 |
| OpenAlex | W2082375941 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 35 |
In 2006, a sudden spread of a strain of a multi-resistant bacterium (Klebsiella pneumonia ESBL) arose inside of the Swedish university hospital in Uppsala. Measures of risk management were taken immediately to fight the bacteria spread in order to stop what soon developed into an epidemic. Officers at the hospital initiated a system of accountability relations, in this article analysed through a model developed by Neyland and Woolgar. We show how the introduction of mundane technoscientific procedures was closely related to efforts of making them understandable, recognisable, relevant and necessary to the actors involved. One and a half year later, the hospital declared the measures taken a success. Abeneficial change of behaviour and practices among the employees, patients and visitors had occurred. Furthermore, the prescription of antibiotics had decreased and become more appropriate and additional rooms with their own sanitary facilities were available. Although succeeding in halting the epidemic, both the implementation and above all the sustainability of the accountability system proved exceedingly exigent. However, to uphold an adequate practice and behaviour in the long run, the system needs constant management and monitoring. Well aware of this difficulty, the officers had the intention of creating a new, self-supporting culture. So far, the ambition of achieving consistent and persistent norms and a new culture seems to have failed. Our conclusions are ofrelevance for understanding how systems of accountability may be used in risk management
Accountability · Biology · Business · Political science · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Technoscience · Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research · Law · Medicine · Risk Perception and Management
Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action
Science in action
Shaping technology/building society
Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action
Studies in ethnomethodology
How Users Matter
‘Balancing risk, that is my life’
Trust, risk and health care reform
Making Sense of Science
The Organizational Accountability of Technological Work
Ethnomethodology's Program
Pandora's hope
Achieving Transparency
Accountability in action
Introduction
Between the Mundane and the Exotic
Ethnomethodology and Sociology
The Mangle of Practice
Epistemic Cultures
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |