The primacy of the noematic. On the methodological relevance of art for phenomenology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21150034 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Guenter Figal (0000-0002-6621-1981, University of Freiburg, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 171-181 |
| Publication date | 2021-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Man and World (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0025-1534 • E-ISSN: 1573-1103 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11007-021-09531-2 |
| OpenAlex | W3131791920 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 2 |
As Husserl already noticed, artworks themselves have a phenomenological character. This means, however, that to experience artworks as phenomena no “ epoché ” and no “phenomenological reduction” is necessary. The leading question of my essay is whether, and possibly how, this observation can be methodologically generalized for understanding phenomena. I discuss if, and possibly how, a phenomenological reflection on art allows and even demands a general conception of phenomenology that nevertheless does not confuse artworks with phenomena in general. My intention is to show that and how phenomenality can be clarified with reference to its spatial character. Accordingly, works of architecture that are artworks will play a decisive role in my argument
Epistemology · Phenomenological method · Temporality · Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy · Philosophy · Philosophy and Historical Thought · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Psychology
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |