Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Andrew Wallace , Peter Taylor-Gooby
ANO 2009
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Journal of Social Policy
ISSN 0047-2794
E-ISSN 1469-7823
EDITORA Cambridge University Press
DOI 10.1017/s0047279409003055
CITAÇÕES 1
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 fe34632bbc9e83b79f7270516f4df535

Resumo

The welfare state faces a number of challenges. Recent reforms in the UK appear broadly successful in attaining targets and improving cost-efficiency, but are nonetheless confronted by public disquiet and unease. This article argues that one difficulty with the new directions in policy is that they rest on a particular and limited understanding of agency. Reformers tend to operate within a theoretical framework that understands behaviour as driven by individual and predominantly rational incentives and pays little attention to the expressive and normative aspects of social action. The problems that arise in these areas when a competitive market logic is applied in social provision tend not to be recognised. Such a logic may contradict established values of social care and commitment to user interests. A qualitative survey of 48 members of the general public is used to examine perceptions of and responses to the NHS reforms, and to show how public discourse in this area is at variance with the instrumental and individual assumptions of policy-makers. The result is that the reform programme damages the legitimacy of the service and that those responsible for the new policies fail to recognise that the individual instrumental agenda is eroding public trust.

Ferramentas