Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

An Institutional Comparison of Child Protection Systems in Australia and Norway Focused on Workforce Retention

Bibliographic Data

ID2115160
AuthorsKaren Healy (0000-0002-7743-1699, The University of Queensland), Siv Oltedal (University of South-Eastern Norway)
Year2010
Volume39
Issue2
Pages255-274
Publication date2010-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Social Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0047-2794 • E-ISSN: 1469-7823
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s004727940999047x
OpenAlexW1993230188
LanguageEN
Citations received26
References cited23

By any standard, child protection work is a demanding field of social services work. Throughout much of the post-industrial world, child protection agencies face significant problems in recruiting and retaining front-line staff with the abilities required to undertake this often complex and stressful work. The capacity of these agencies to achieve their social policy objectives can be compromised by workforce instability. Despite a growing body of evidence about the contribution of local organisational and caseworker characteristics to workforce turnover, policy-makers face a dearth of information about how the broader institutional context of child protection systems contributes to challenges in workforce retention. This lack of evidence is notable given the varying rates of caseworker turnover observed internationally, particularly between social policy regimes where different institutional contexts shape workforce conditions. This article aims to contribute to the evidence base for improving workforce retention in child protection services through an institutional comparison of child protection systems in Queensland (Australia) and Norway. We analyse the role of the institutional conditions in shaping the nature and scope of child protection work, characteristics and responsibilities of caseworkers, and their financial remuneration for this work. We discuss how these institutional effects help to explain the differences in workforce turnover among child protection workers in Queensland and Norway

Business · Child protection · Context (archaeology) · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · Political science · Public relations · Remuneration · Work (physics) · Workforce · Workforce planning · Child Abuse and Trauma · Employment and Welfare Studies · Engineering · Finance · Medicine · Nursing · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work

  • Fathers and child welfare services in Norway

    Anita Skårstad Storhaug, Lee Sobo-Allen•Families Relationships and…•2017

  • Child welfare workers’ experiences of obstacles in care order preparation

    Ida Juhasz, Ida Benedicte Juhasz et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2016

  • Norwegian Child Welfare Services

    Bente Heggem Kojan•Australian Social Work•2011

  • Child Protection Systems

    Neil Gilbert, Nigel Parton et al.•Child protection systems•2011

  • Transnational social workers’ lived experience in statutory child protection

    Corina Modderman, Guinever Threlkeld et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2018

  • Risk and protective factors among child protection social workers

    Elena Cabiati, Maria Luisa Raineri et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2018

  • When the Norwegian child-welfare services get involved

    Ingunn Studsrød, Ingunn T Ellingsen et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2015

  • Parents' perceptions of contact with the N orwegian C hild W elfare S ervices

    Open Access•Ingunn Studsrød, Elisabeth Willumsen et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2012

  • A comparison of systems and outcomes for safeguarding children in Australia and Norway

    Open Access•Bente Heggem Kojan, Bob Lonne•Child & Family Social Work•2011

  • Collaborating with families in differential responses

    Open Access•Karen Healy, Gai Harrison et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2014

  • Resilience Among Social Workers

    Ed Carson, Sue King et al.•Practice•2011

  • Work division processes in social work with Cuban and Norwegian families

    Open Access•Siv Oltedal, Angela Peña et al.•Journal of Comparative Social Work•2019

  • A Comparison of Out-of-home Care for Children and Young People in Australia and Sweden

    Karen Healy, Tommy Lundström et al.•Australian Social Work•2011

  • Recognising and Enabling Social Workers to Promote Child Wellbeing and Protection

    Karen Healy•Australian Social Work•2010

  • Barriers and solutions

    Open Access•Fiona Oates•AlterNative An International…•2020

  • Transnational social workers in statutory child welfare

    Open Access•Corina Modderman, Guinever Threlkeld et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2017

  • Public perceptions of child protection, children’s rights, and personal values

    Open Access•Jill D Berrick, Marit Skivenes et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2023

  • Employment mobility or turnover? An analysis of child welfare and protection employee retention

    Open Access•Kenneth Burns, Alastair Christie•Children and Youth Services Review•2013

  • Fathers' involvement with the Child Welfare Service

    Open Access•Anita Skårstad Storhaug•Children and Youth Services Review•2013

  • Substance-related problems among adolescents in child welfare services

    Open Access•Ove Heradstveit, Nathalie Gjertsen et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2020

  • Impacts of transformational leadership on turnover intention of child welfare workers

    Open Access•Taekyung Park, Tae Kyung Park et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2020

  • From Glass Escalator to Glass Travelator

    Karin Kullberg•The British Journal of Social Work•2013

  • The Role of Place for Transnational Social Workers in Statutory Child Protection

    Open Access•Corina Modderman, Guinever Threlkeld et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2019

  • Social Service Workforce Strengthening in Sub-Saharan Africa

    Open Access•Jeanette Schmid•The British Journal of Social Work•2018

  • Challenges and Opportunities

    S Softestad, Siri Søftestad et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2013

  • Parental Freedom in the Context of Risk to the Child

    Open Access•Jill D Berrick, Marit Skivenes et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2023

  • The international epidemiology of child sexual abuse

    Open Access•David Finkelhor•Child Abuse & Neglect•1994

  • The effects of the ARC organizational intervention on caseworker turnover, climate, and culture in children's service systems

    Open Access•Charles Glisson, Denzel Dukes et al.•Child Abuse & Neglect•2006

  • The Effects of Organizational Climate and Interorganizational Coordination on the Quality and Outcomes of Children’s Service Systems

    Open Access•Charles Glisson, Anthony L Hemmelgarn et al.•Child Abuse & Neglect•1998

  • Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies

    G Esping-Andersen•Social foundations of postindustria…•1999

  • Provisional Selves

    Open Access•Herminia Ibarra•Administrative Science Quarterly•1999

  • Search for an Indicator of Effective Child Protection in a Re-analysis of Child Homicide in the Major Western Countries 1973-1992

    C Pritchard•The British Journal of Social Work•1996

  • Social work and Nordic welfare policies for children—present challenges in the light of the past

    Guðný Björk Eydal, Mirja Satka•European Journal of Social Work•2006

  • Unitarian ideals and professional diversity in social work practice—the case of Sweden

    Åke Bergmark, Tommy Lundström•European Journal of Social Work•2007

  • Five tumultuous years in Australian child protection

    Open Access•Frank Ainsworth, Patricia Hansen•Child & Family Social Work•2006

  • Social Workers’ Preparation for Child Protection

    Karen Healy, Gabrielle Meagher•Australian Social Work•2007

  • Welfare reforms, family resources, and child maltreatment

    Open Access•Christina Paxson, Jane Waldfogel•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2002

  • Why do they leave? Modeling child welfare workers' turnover intentions

    Open Access•Michàlle E Mor Barak, Amy Levin et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2006

  • Ideas and Social Policy

    Open Access•Daniel Béland•Social Policy and Administration•2005

  • Regulation and Risk in Social Work

    K McLaughlin•The British Journal of Social Work•2006

  • Why Are They Leaving? Factors Affecting Intention to Leave among Social Workers in Child Welfare

    Pia Tham•The British Journal of Social Work•2006

  • Wages of Virtue

    P England, Michelle J Budig et al.•Social Problems•2002

  • A case of mistaken identity

    Open Access•Karen Healy•Journal of Sociology•2009

  • The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism

    Open Access•Ellen M Immergut•Latin American Politics and Society•1998

  • Abused and Looked After Children as 'Moral Dirt

    Open Access•Harry Ferguson•Journal of Social Policy•2007

Unique citing works26
Citations per year1,63
Citation span2010 - 2023 (14)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 23

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae