Future potential of economic impact assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21153499 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Galina Williams (0000-0002-1645-6104, Central Queensland University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 272-277 |
| Publication date | 2020-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-5517 • E-ISSN: 1471-5465 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14615517.2019.1684097 |
| OpenAlex | W2981837175 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 21 |
Economic impact assessment (EcIA) has attracted some criticism due to its limited focus. Typically, EcIA is used to validate the proposed proposals based on growth in income and employment. This paper argues that EcIA should play a more active and stronger role in impact assessment. For example, the impacts of the proposed projects should be assessed using the economic development goals rather than only changes in economic growth. The conceptual framework for the comprehensive impact assessment is discussed. Examples of indicators that can be used in relation to sustainable development goals are provided
Criticism · Economic impact analysis · Economics · Environmental planning · Impact assessment · Political science · Sustainable development · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Environmental Science · Mining and Resource Management · Public Administration · Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy
What Is Wrong With Eia and Sea Anyway? A Sceptic's Perspective on Sustainability Assessment
Sustainability assessment
Applying sustainability assessment models
Environmental economic valuation and its application in environmental assessment
A systemic framework for sustainability assessment
Second Growth
Coal mining and the resource community cycle
World Development Report 1991
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |