Project IA scoping following a regional or strategic assessment
Workshop perspectives from Canadian federal IA regulators and authorities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21153590 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Steve Bonnell (Memorial University of Newfoundland, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Pages | 1-12 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-5517 • E-ISSN: 1471-5465 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14615517.2026.2665949 |
| OpenAlex | W7160258446 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 31 |
Regional and strategic assessments (RAs/SAs) can influence the quality, effectiveness and efficiency of subsequent project impact assessments (IAs) in various ways. This can include improving project proposals by affecting the nature, intensity and distribution of future development, by addressing important issues through larger effects management approaches, or by contributing information, analysis, mitigation and context to these later assessments. This article presents the findings of two workshops held in late 2025 with federal government personnel that are involved in project IAs in Atlantic Canada. Through questions about overall RA/SA objectives and their various potential outputs, the workshops sought participants’ views on whether, how and to what degree these may be influential in project IA scoping decisions by government. RAs/SAs are viewed largely as foundational and contextual pieces for later project IAs, rather than replacing or significantly streamlining most aspects of these assessments due to issues of scale, and the need to still consider environmental conditions, potential effects and mitigation in a project-, site- and time-specific context. RA/SA outputs are therefore seen primarily as a means of ‘scoping better’ rather than ‘scoping out’, and for informing project IA conduct by proponents
Public policy · Strategic planning · Construction Project Management and Performance · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Regulation and Compliance Studies
A conceptual basis and methodological framework for regional strategic environmental assessment (R-SEA)
The interminable issue of effectiveness
Assessing the impact of strategic environmental assessment
Project EA scoping in an SEA context
Strategic environmental assessment
Environmental impact assessment
The inefficiency of environmental impact assessment
SEA and EIA
Determining the value and influence of informal strategic advice for environmental impact assessment
Environmental assessments of strategic decisions and project decisions
Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in Canada under directive-based and informal practice
Quality of environmental impact statements and variability of scrutiny by reviewers
Ripe for decision”
Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes
Conceptualizing strategic environmental assessment
Improving impact assessment efficiency
Raising the game in environmental assessment
Conceptual and methodological challenges to integrating SEA and cumulative effects assessment
Advancing strategic environmental assessment in the offshore oil and gas sector
Scoping in environmental impact assessment
Tiering strategic environmental assessment and project environmental impact assessment in highway planning in São Paulo, Brazil
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |