Evaluation of stakeholder impacts in cost-benefit analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21154053 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Glenn P Jenkins (0000-0003-4416-0164, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 87-96 |
| Publication date | 1999-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-5517 • E-ISSN: 1471-5465 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3152/147154699781767927 |
| OpenAlex | W2058582046 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 4 |
The scope of the analyses of public and private investment projects is expanded beyond the traditional criteria offinancial and economic net present value. If the economic and financial analyses are carried out using a common numeraire, they can include issues of stakeholder impacts, poverty impacts, and an assessment of the long-term sustainability of the project. We can now assess the income impacts on different interest groups. This forces the analyst to do a reconciliation between the economic performance, the financial performance and the distributional impacts of a project. Three examples aregiven ofprojects in Cyprus, Bangladesh and the Philippines: traditional economic and Jinancial analyses would not have identified many of the most important aspects of theprocess that determined whether or not theprojects would be implemented and sustainable
Business · Economic growth · Economic impact analysis · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Macroeconomics · Net present value · Numéraire · Political science · Poverty · Stakeholder · Sustainability · Economic, financial, and policy analysis · Finance
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.19 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2019 (15) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |