Environmental impact assessment follow-up and its benefits for industry
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21154311 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ross Marshall, Ross J Marshall (0000-0001-5756-0306, Environment Agency, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 191-196 |
| Publication date | 2005-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-5517 • E-ISSN: 1471-5465 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3152/147154605781765571 |
| OpenAlex | W1990044318 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 2 |
Applying follow-up within environmental impact assessment (EIA) is no longer an option but a sound precaution and a proactive measure in today's heavily regulated industrial environment, where the announcement of new development is treated with dismay and opposition by local residents. Increasingly, successful development is viewed in terms of its final result—its operational environmental performance, its acceptance by stakeholders, its contribution to sustainable development, and, critically, the scale or magnitude of environmental impact over all life-cycle phases. For astute proponents, the evidence suggests that EIA follow-up has a valuable role to play in good developmental practice. It can also encourage integration of environmental perspectives into developmental programmes, the systematic implementation of mitigation and the triggering of environmental risk responses posed through construction activities. This paper shares experience with EIA follow-up from an industry practitioner's viewpoint to assist with learning from experience and capacity building. Seven perceived functions of EIA follow-up are examined alongside specific case studies
Business · Environmental impact assessment · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Political science · Process management · Sustainable development · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Environmental Science · Mining and Resource Management · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
The perceived benefits of EIA for government
What would environmental impact assessment look like if we started from scratch today? Designing better EIA for developed neoliberal nations
Monitoring and auditing the local socio-economic and environmental impacts of the early stage construction of Hinkley Point C Nuclear Power Station, UK
Environmental impact assessment during project execution phases
International principles for best practice EIA follow-up
Challenges to integrate health impact assessment into environmental assessment procedures
Development of environmental management program in environmental impact assessment reports and evaluation of its robustness
EIA and EMS integration
Appraising affected community perceptions of implementing programs listed in the environmental impact statement
An evaluation of ecological impact assessment procedural effectiveness over time
Stakeholder perceptions of Environmental Management Plans as an environmental protection tool for major developments in the UK
EIA and green procurement
Appraising the value of independent EIA follow-up verifiers
Regulators' perceptions of environmental impact assessment (EIA) benefits in a sustainable development context
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2024 (20) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 14 |