Mitigation banking and compensation pools
Improving the effectiveness of impact mitigation regulation in project planning procedures
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21154375 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wolfgang Wende (0000-0002-1421-4654, Technische Universität Berlin), Alfred Herberg (Technische Universität Berlin), Angela Herzberg (IWW Water Centre) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 101-111 |
| Publication date | 2005-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-5517 • E-ISSN: 1471-5465 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3152/147154605781765652 |
| OpenAlex | W2016969105 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
| References cited | 3 |
Germany has an important planning instrument with a focus on preserving nature and the landscape: impact mitigation regulation. The planned mitigation and compensation measures are mandatory and legally binding. It is hoped that the way will now be open for innovative solutions by ‘compensation pools’. This paper gives a brief overview of interim research results of a current research project by the Technical University of Berlin, illustrating the general approach of impact mitigation regulation and of compensation pools. It discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the German approach and describes the main criteria defining ‘good practice’ in establishing these pools. A case study demonstrates the implementation of a pool in Germany
Business · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · German · Impact assessment · Interim · Political science · Strengths and weaknesses · Computer Science · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Environmental Conservation and Management · Environmental Science · Public Administration
The EU emissions trading scheme
Payments for ecosystem services
Assessing ecological equivalence in biodiversity offset schemes
Governing for “no net loss” of biodiversity over the long term
Credible biodiversity offsetting needs public national registers to confirm no net loss
Does landscape play a role in the governance of the coastal region? An evolutionary perspective from Portugal since 1950
Effectiveness of environmental offsets in environmental impact assessment
Ecological compensation in spatial planning in Italy
Biodiversity impact assessment of two large dam projects in India under long term multi-scenarios simulation
Simplification and potential replacement of EA in the UK – is it fit for purpose
Better than Doing Nothing’ – constructing support for biodiversity offsetting in Finland
Mitigation banking
Should We Be Wary of Mitigation Banking? Evidence Regarding the Risks Associated with this Wetland Offset Arrangement in Florida
Safeguards for enhancing ecological compensation in Sweden
Forcing Germany's renewable energy targets by increased energy crop production
Environmental impact assessment
Putting the Plan into Practice
| Unique citing works | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,89 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2024 (18) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 16 |