How backsliding government parties defend democratic backsliding in the European Parliament
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21155700 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Winzen (0000-0003-4489-8943, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Union Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1465-1165 • E-ISSN: 1741-2757 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14651165261463883 |
| OpenAlex | W7166512236 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 37 |
How do backsliding government parties defend democratic backsliding in the European Parliament? Analyzing manually and large language model-coded data, I find that the backsliders’ arguments do not strongly reflect their illiberalism. Instead, they rely on alleging bias and misconduct by opponents and the advocacy of sovereignty, complemented by situational arguments about election results, Russia, and other member states, among others. Regression analyses tentatively suggest that increasing conflict between the backsliders and other groups helps explain the choice of arguments. The results raise the possibility of an underappreciated mechanism—pushing backsliders into making detrimental arguments—of European Parliament influence on European Union decisions on backsliding. They also indicate that the choice of arguments by backsliding government parties might be less strategically apt and more reactive than sometimes assumed
Democracy · European union · Government (linguistics) · Parliament · Situational ethics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · European Union Policy and Governance · Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Political Entrepreneurs
Backsliding Populist Governments in the Council
Farewell to the liberal consensus
Explaining degrees of far-right illiberalism in the European parliament
The ideational foundations of the illiberal backlash in Central and Eastern Europe
Enduring consensus
Contesting EU authority in the name of European identity
The EU’s Enfants Terribles
Supranational responses to democratic backsliding
Will the European Union escape its autocracy trap
The European Union's authoritarian equilibrium
The Gramscian politics of Europe’s rule of law crisis
Taming of the shrews? The (non-)enforcement of informal norms in the European Council
Party Politics and Radical Right Populism in the European Parliament
Right‐Wing Sovereignism in the European Union
Money Talks? The Effectiveness of Sanctions in the ‘Rule of Law’ Conflict in the European Union
News about the European Parliament
Why does the European Right accommodate backsliding states? An analysis of 24 European People’s Party votes (2011–2019)
Who inhabits the European public sphere? Winners and losers, supporters and opponents in Europeanised political debates
Ambiguity and interpretive politics in the crisis of European values
Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals
MEP Responses to Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Poland. An Analysis of Agenda‐Setting and Voting Behaviour
Open-source LLMs for text annotation
The party political make-up of EU legislative bodies1
Unravelling national governments’ positions on EU rule of law enforcement
The domestic politics of EU action against democratic backsliding
The rhetoric of inaction
Can courts rescue national democracy? Judicial safeguards against democratic backsliding in the EU
The Anatomy of Democratic Backsliding
Defining and Operationalising Defiant Non‐Compliance in the EU
The Commission's Approach to Rule of Law Backsliding
The anatomy of populist ideology
Measuring Populism in Political Parties
The Causal Effect of Radical Right Success on Mainstream Parties’ Policy Positions
The PopuList
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |