Decoding the authoritarian code

Exercising ‘legitimate’ power politics through the ruling parties in Turkey, Macedonia and Serbia

Bibliographic Data

ID21156519
AuthorsCengiz Günay (0000-0001-7586-571X, Austrian Institute for International Affairs, corresponding author), Vedran Džihić (Austrian Institute for International Affairs)
Year2016
Volume16
Issue4
Pages529-549
Publication date2016-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1468-3857 • E-ISSN: 1743-9639
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14683857.2016.1242872
OpenAlexW2534831081
LanguageEN
Citations received40
References cited30

While neoliberal interventions and policies have had serious effects on all societies, their impact on the institutional setting of some countries in the European periphery has been particularly drastic. Over the last years, countries as Turkey, Macedonia and Serbia – which we have selected as an illustration for the trend – have gone through processes of Europeanization and neoliberal transformation. For the ruling parties the ‘European agenda’ and neoliberal structural adjustment reforms opened new spaces to alter established political routines and reconfigure institutional settings. In the light of generally weak institutions, the ruling parties in Turkey, Macedonia and Serbia have aimed at consolidating their power through the adoption of authoritarian patterns of governance. The three countries experienced a democratic rollback accompanied by a rise of authoritarian tendencies, limiting the space for democratic contestation. The article explores the foundations and mechanisms of the authoritarian patterns of governance in the three countries. Developments in Macedonia and Serbia are dealt in reference to the power system and the claims to legitimacy of the ruling Justice and Development Party in Turkey. The article argues that the ruling parties’ power derives from their legitimation strategies based on institutional reforms in line with EU conditionality, redistribution through informal channels and populist nationalist narratives. The ruling parties function as machines and clientelistic channels. They have been sidelining or replacing formal institutions and practices with negative long-term repercussions on democracy and the functioning of the state

Authoritarianism · Clientelism · Conditionality · Corporate governance · Democracy · Economic system · Economics · Legitimacy · Legitimation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Balkans: History, Politics, Society · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Turkey's Politics and Society

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub