Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cost-Benefit Analyses of Transportation Investments - Neither critical nor realistic [1]

Bibliographic Data

ID21159691
AuthorsPetter Næ (0000-0001-8571-8326, corresponding author), Petter Naess
Year2006
Volume5
Issue1
Pages32-60
Publication date2006-05-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Critical Realism (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1476-7430 • E-ISSN: 1572-5138
PublisherManey Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1163/157251306776892830
OpenAlexW1967978629
LanguageEN
Citations received7

This paper discusses the practice of cost-benefit analyses of transportation infrastructure investment projects from the meta-theoretical perspective of critical realism. Such analyses are based on a number of untenable ontological assumptions about social value, human nature and the natural environment. In addition, main input data are based on transport modelling analyses based on a misleading ‘local ontology’ among the model makers. The ontological misconceptions translate into erroneous epistemological assumptions about the possibility of precise predictions and the validity of willingness-to-pay investigations. Accepting the ontological and epistemological assumptions of cost-benefit analysis involves an implicit acceptance of the ethical and political values favoured by these assumptions. Cost-benefit analyses of transportation investment projects tend to neglect long-term environmental consequences and needs among population groups with a low ability to pay. Instead of cost-benefit analyses, impact analyses evaluating the likely effects of project alternatives against a wide range of societal goals is recommended, with quantification and economic valorisation only for impact categories where this can be done in an ontologically and epistemologically defensible way

Business · Economics · Complex Systems and Decision Making · Economic Theory and Institutions · Economic, financial, and policy analysis

  • What Kinds of Traffic Forecasts are Possible

    Petter Næ, Petter Naess et al.•Journal of Critical Realism•2012

  • An assessment of interventions for improving communication and trust in cost benefit analysis processes

    Els Beukers, Luca Bertolini et al.•Impact Assessment and Project…•2015

  • Managing the insolvable limitations of cost-benefit analysis

    Open Access•Niek Mouter, Jan Anne Annema et al.•Transportation•2015

  • Transcending Dilemmas in Urban Policy-Making

    António Ferreira, Joana Ribeiro-Santos et al.•Planning Theory & Practice•2020

  • Learning critical realist research by example

    Steve Melia•Journal of Critical Realism•2020

  • Interdisciplinarity, Ecology and Scientific Theory

    Karl Georg Høyer, Karl Høyer et al.•Journal of Critical Realism•2008

  • Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments

    Open Access•Matthew Cashmore, Tim Richardson et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2010

Citations per year0.39
Citation span2008 - 2020 (13)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae