Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Taxonomy, ecology, harvesting methods, ethnopharmacological use, trade and prospects for sustainable management of Prunus africana (Hook. f.) Kalkman (Rosaceae)

Bibliographic Data

ID21175871
AuthorsEloge Kambale Muhesi (corresponding author), Moïse Musubao Kapiri (0009-0006-8774-2614, Université Catholique du Graben), Natacha Nana Afiong (University of Douala), Pascal Billong Fils, Jean Lagarde Betti (0000-0002-2665-8367, University of Douala), Ndongo Din (0000-0002-4382-0979, University of Douala), Armand Wilfried Bile (University of Douala), Alain Rayane Mpouam (University of Douala), Lorette Guedeu (University of Douala), Moïse Kambale Kataliko
Year2024
Volume29
Publication date2024-10-10
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthnobotany Research and Applications (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1547-3465 • E-ISSN: 1547-3465
PublisherIlia State University (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.32859/era.29.46.1-28
OpenAlexW4403283635
LanguageEN

Background: Prunus africana (Hook. F) Kalkman has been the spotlight of foresters and scientists for several decades. However, the knowledge about this plant, which is classified as endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), is patchy. This article provides a bibliographic review for the current knowledge on Prunus africana, focus on harvesting methods, ethnobotanical and ethnopharmacological use, trade and stakeholder involvement in the sustainable management of this species. Methods: The literature cited was obtained from Google Scholar, PubMed, JSTOR and Scopus databases. A total of 122 documents (scientific articles, reports and thesis) were consulted. Grey literature was used in addition to published scientific research. Results: Knowledge on the ethnobotanical and ethnopharmacological importance of P. africana has developed considerably in recent years. Prunus africana is known in more than 22 countries and is for the use of utilized for its bark, which is used on medicinally to treat various diseases. The literature shows the climatic diversity of P. africana habitats (altitude, rainfall and temperature) in African countries. Currently, eight techniques are used to harvest the bark of P. africana: 1/2, 2/4 opposite, 3/4, 4/8, complete debarking, 1/4 felling and 3/6. Six techniques have been categorized as illegal (felling, complete debarking, 3/6, 3/4, 1/2, 1/4), while two have been presented as legal (2/4 and 4/8). While international trade in P. africana is regulated to ensure sustainable management, the impact of exploitation and trade in products destined for local markets is not yet known and evaluated in the literature on this species. The article raises concerns about the impacts of medicinal use, logging, land-use and land-cover change, deforestation, habitat fragmentation and climate change on the conservation and endangerment of P. africana. Conclusion: Future research should be conducted to improve knowledge on ecology, genetics and phylogeny, phenology, harvesting techniques that promote natural regeneration after debarking, and vulnerability of P. africana to climate change to promote sustainable management of this species. Keywords: Prunus africana, harvesting methods, ethnobotanical and ethnopharmacological use, trade, sustainable management

Biology · Geography · Hook · Prunus · Rosaceae · African Botany and Ecology Studies · Botanical Studies and Applications · Engineering · Nuts composition and effects · Ecology · Forestry

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae