‘Is voice inevitable in written texts?’ Animate agents followed by active verbs as writers’ (de)voicing mechanisms in knowledge dissemination practices
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21180431 |
|---|---|
| Authors | María Isabel Herrando Rodrigo (0000-0003-3895-5534, Universidad de Zaragoza, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 90 |
| Pages | 81-94 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1576-4737 • E-ISSN: 1576-4737 |
| Publisher | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5209/clac.81309 |
| OpenAlex | W4229060953 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 35 |
Writers’ identity (Ivanič, 1998) and positioning in written text have been studied under multiple terms. However, a clearer distinction should be made between writers’ positioning (Hyland, 2005a) and writers’ presence or voice (John, 2005). This paper explores how disseminators and specialised writers adapt or mediate the voice of the researchers and writers of medical research articles (Med-RAs) in the corresponding medical popularizations published on-line (Med-E-Pops). By manually scanning a self-compiled corpus of 40 Med-RAs and their 40 Med-E-Pops published in digital sources, it will be shown how evidence of the most personal authorial voice used in research articles, self-mentions, are adapted in the Med-E-Pops texts using other (de)voicing mechanisms. Results from the data-driven analysis show that whereas Med-RAs researchers claim their authorship, knowledge and prestige, Med-E-Pops writers make their own voice negligible to guide the readers’ attention back to the Med-RAs writers’ presence. Med-E-Pops writers ratify Med-RAs writers’ agency creating trustworthy texts for the audience
Aesthetics · Art · Linguistics · Medical education · Medical writing · Prestige · Sociology · Trustworthiness · Voice · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
Writing and Identity
Academic Writing for Graduate Students, 3rd Edition
The ‘I’ in identity
Constructing proximity
Voice in academic writing
Internet users beware, you follow online health rumors (more than counter-rumors) irrespective of risk propensity and prior endorsement
Big science, little news
Communication and Engagement with Science and Technology
Why should we promote public engagement with science
Closeness and distance through the agentive authorial voice
Science blogs as competing channels for the dissemination of science news
A Longitudinal Study of the New York Times Science Times Section
Stance and engagement
Ken Hyland, Metadiscourse
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |