Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Context and Culture via Cohesive Devices in Higher Education Students’ and Professional Writers’ Opinion Articles

Bibliographic Data

ID21185267
AuthorsEmad A S Abu-Ayyash (0000-0002-6860-3233, British University in Dubai, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume20
Issue1
Pages106-120
Publication date2020-02-28
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGEMA Online Journal of Language Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1675-8021 • E-ISSN: 2550-2131
PublisherPenerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM Press) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.17576/gema-2020-2001-07
OpenAlexW3008192122
LanguageEN
References cited9

The literature on cohesive devices is marked with evident dearth in studies that consider the context-text ties. The current paper attempts to fill this gap, and, therefore, combat an idealised ‘villain’ in research, which is confining textual analysis to in-text relations. The study propounds the idea of expanding the analysis to include ties between the written text and the surrounding context and culture. The specific purpose is to explore the use and function of the cohesive devices which link the text to the context (exophora) and the ones that relate the text to the culture (homophora). The methodology involved explaining the cohesive devices to a postgraduate TESOL class of eight students (non-native speakers of English) in one of the universities in the UAE. After that, the students were asked to work in pairs and produce four opinion articles about a recent newspaper topic of their choice. They selected the United Kingdom Independent Party (UKIP) leader’s call to ban the burqa in the UK. In addition, two articles from the Independent and the Guardian on the same topic were also discussed. Comparative analysis was conducted on the six articles vis-à-vis the use and functions of cohesive devices. The analysis involved four categories: person deixis , spatial deixis , temporal deixis , and the definite article . The findings showed that exophoric and homopohric cohesive devices were employed abundantly, with exophora occurring in more instances. The study also revealed the relevant functions that have evident implications about assumptive and supportive roles of cohesive devices

Engineering ethics · Pedagogy · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Engineering · History · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology

  • Textual Patterns

    Mike Scott, Christopher Tribble•Textual patterns•2006

  • Text, Context, Pretext

    Open Access•H G Widdowson•Text, Context, Pretext•2004

  • Cohesion in English

    M A K Halliday, Μ Α Κ Halliday et al.•Cohesion in English•2014

  • The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality

    Open Access•Scott A Crossley, Kristopher Kyle et al.•Journal of Second Language Writing•2016

  • An Introduction to Functional Grammar

    M A K Halliday, Μ Α Κ Halliday et al.•Introduction to Functional Grammar•2014

  • Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates

    Open Access•Meihua Liu, George Braine•System•2005

  • Coherence and Academic Writing

    Ann M Johns•TESOL Quarterly•1986

  • Culture, Context, and Behavior

    Open Access•D Matsumoto•Journal of Personality•2007

  • The Use of Cohesive Devices in Descriptive Writing by Omani Student-Teachers

    Open Access•Zuhair Abdul Amir Abdul Rahman•SAGE Open•2013

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae