Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Refusal Speech Act Response

Differences between South Koreans and North Korean Refugees in Inducing Speech Acts and Directness

Bibliographic Data

ID21185273
AuthorsHaiyoung Lee, Hai‐Young Lee (0000-0002-3773-6228, Ewha Womans University Medical Center), Bolami Lee (Pushkin State Russian language Institute), Hee Chung Chun (0000-0001-7932-8380, Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights)
Year2018
Volume18
Issue2
Pages17-30
Publication date2018-05-28
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGEMA Online Journal of Language Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1675-8021 • E-ISSN: 2550-2131
PublisherPenerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM Press) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.17576/gema-2018-1802-02
OpenAlexW2807140212
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited2

The majority of previous studies on North Korean Refugees (NKRs) focused on the linguistic heterogeneity of pronunciation and vocabulary use. Only a handful of studies examined differences between South Koreans’ (SKs) and NKRs’ language use and they concluded that NKRs prefer direct refusal speech acts rather than indirect ones. However, we hypothesized that NKRs’ preference on direct refusal speech acts would vary depending on the types of inducing speech acts; speech acts that induces refusal expressions. 47 SKs and 43 NKRs answered three questions after watching video clips of short conversation in refusal situations. The results were statistically analyzed with independent sample t -tests and multi response analyses, revealing that NKRs preference on direct refusal speech acts varied depending on the types of inducing speech act. In addition, multi response analyses indicated that the NKRs and SKs evaluated the same rejecter’s personality differently and that this difference may result in miscommunication. Lastly, NKRs’ evaluations on the refusal speech acts did not change over time, as NKRs who stayed less than a year in South Korea and those who stayed more than five years did not show significant difference in their evaluation. This result suggests that explicit education on this may be required. Additionally, it is worth to note that current research confirms that SKs and NKRs react differently toward expressions used only in North Korea, and, therefore, not only the refusal strategy, but also the refusal expression itself are both important for successful communication. Additionally, the results showed that refusing with non-avoidable and non-personal reasons were perceived more positively than personal reasons. These findings suggest that for successful communication to happen between two groups with different linguistic backgrounds, pragmatic awareness in language use is helpful

Audiology · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies · Medicine · Psychology

  • Daya tindak perlokusi pengguna instagram dalam unggahan bertema Covid-19

    Open Access•Anak Agung Ayu DIan Andriyani, I Dewa Ayu Devi Maharani Santika et al.•KEMBARA Journal of Scientific…•2021

  • On the effects of instruction in second language pragmatics

    Open Access•Kenneth R Rose•System•2005

  • Conversational implicature in a second language

    Open Access•Lawrence F Bouton•Journal of Pragmatics•1994

Citations per year0.2
Citation span2021 - 2021 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae