Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Congresswomen, Legislative Entrepreneurship, and the Basis for Effective Legislating in the U.S. House, 1973–2008

Bibliographic Data

ID21189200
AuthorsNicole Kalaf-Hughes (0000-0002-1244-5301, Bowling Green State University), Jason A Macdonald (0000-0002-4227-243X, West Virginia University), Lauren M Santoro (Western Governors University)
Year2022
Volume18
Issue3
Pages640-671
Publication date2022-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitics & Gender (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1743-923X • E-ISSN: 1743-9248
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1743923x21000015
OpenAlexW3170736249
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited30

Research indicates that congresswomen are more effective at moving bills through the lawmaking process than their male counterparts. To investigate why, we discuss what legislative entrepreneurship involves and explain why it can serve as the basis for problem-solving and effective lawmaking in the U.S. Congress. We also examine the entrepreneurial work that members of Congress did on behalf of bills that they sponsored from 1973 to 2008. Among other findings, we observe that congresswomen, especially those in the minority party, are more entrepreneurial than their male colleagues. This finding enhances our understanding of why female lawmakers are more effective lawmakers

Entrepreneurship · House of Representatives · Law and economics · Lawmaking · Legislative process · Legislature · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Public Administration

  • Understanding the Policy Priorities of Republican Women in the US House of Representatives

    Open Access•Michele L Swers, Danielle M Thomsen•Politics & Gender•2025

  • Breaking Down Stereotypes by Realizing Women's Interests

    Open Access•Beatriz Carrasco, Fabiola Mota et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2024

  • Affective Polarization and Consensus Building Among Parliamentary Elites

    Open Access•Leonardo Sánchez-Ferrer, Mariano Torcal•American Behavioral Scientist•2024

  • Is Bipartisanship Dead?

    Open Access•Laurel Harbridge•Is Bipartisanship Dead?•2015

  • Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House

    David W Rohde•Parties and leaders in the…•1991

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • When Women Lead

    Cindy Simon Rosenthal•When women lead•1998

  • Gendered Vulnerability

    Jeffrey Lazarus, Amy Steigerwalt•Gendered Vulnerability•2018

  • It Takes a Candidate

    Open Access•Jennifer L Lawle, Jennifer L Lawless et al.•It Takes a Candidate•2001

  • Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Gregory J Wawro, Gregory Wawro•Legislative Entrepreneurship in…•2000

  • Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress

    Open Access•Craig Volden, Alan E Wiseman•Legislative Effectiveness in the…•2014

  • Legislative Leviathan

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Legislative Leviathan•2007

  • Support for Women's Interests in the 103rd Congress

    Julie Dolan•Women & Politics•1998

  • Gender Bias and Selection Bias in House Elections

    Open Access•Jeffrey Milyo, Samantha Schosberg•Public Choice•2000

  • What It Takes to Win

    Kathryn Pearson, Eric Mcghee•Politics & Gender•2013

  • Support for women's interests in the 103rd congress

    Julie Dolan•Women & Politics•1997

  • Conflict and Cooperation

    Beth Reingold•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • The Impact of Women on State Legislative Policies

    Sue Thomas•The Journal of Politics•1991

  • "Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes

    Joanna Mansbridge, Jane Mansbridge•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • The Republican Revolution and the House Appropriations Committee

    John H Aldrich, David W Rohde•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • The Primary Reason for Women's Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom

    Jennifer L Lawle, Jennifer L Lawless et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Women’s Issues and Their Fates in the US Congress

    Open Access•Craig Volden, Alan E Wiseman et al.•Political Science Research and…•2018

  • Elevating Women’s Voices in Congress

    Open Access•Kathryn Pearson, Logan Dancey•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • The Role of Candidate Sex in Voter Decision‐Making

    Open Access•Richard L Fox, Eric R A N Smith•Political Psychology•1998

  • Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women's Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues

    Open Access•Michele L Swers•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1998

  • Legislative Productivity in the 93d–105th Congresses

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, William C Terry•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Does Descriptive Representation Facilitate Women's Distinctive Voice? How Gender Composition and Decision Rules Affect Deliberation

    Open Access•Tali Mendelberg, Christopher F Karpowitz et al.•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • When Are Women More Effective Lawmakers Than Men

    Open Access•Craig Volden, Alan E Wiseman et al.•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • The Jackie (and Jill) Robinson Effect

    Open Access•Sarah F Anzia, Christopher R Berry•American Journal of Political…•2011

  • Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation

    Open Access•Christopher F Karpowitz, Tali Mendelberg et al.•American Political Science Review•2012

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae