Poison, polygamy and postcolonial politics
The first Chinese Australian novel
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21189622 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Zhong Huang (0000-0002-2161-1359, Wuhan University), Wenche Ommundsen (University of Wollongong, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 533-544 |
| Publication date | 2016-09-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Postcolonial Writing (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-9855 • E-ISSN: 1744-9863 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17449855.2016.1230170 |
| OpenAlex | W2560363498 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 5 |
This article examines the first novel written by a Chinese diaspora writer in Australia, The Poison of Polygamy (多妻毒), published in instalments in the Chinese-language newspaper Chinese Times (Melbourne) from 1909 to 1910. Set during the Gold Rush of the 1850s, the novel is nevertheless of its own time, reflecting the pressing concerns of a community in turmoil as the political upheavals of China in the final years of the Qing dynasty competed for attention with the disastrous effects of the White Australia policy. Taking the form of a picaresque and cautionary tale warning against traditional practices such as polygamy, opium smoking and foot-binding, the novel seeks to educate members of the lower classes of the Chinese community while embracing the republican cause against the Manchu rulers. The article argues that the progressive political agenda of the text (democratic, feminist) stands in sharp contrast to the view of the Chinese which prevailed in the white Australian community at the time
China · Chinese community · Democracy · Diaspora · Media studies · Newspaper · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Asian American and Pacific Histories · Asian Studies and History · Gender Studies · History · Japanese History and Culture · Law
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2019 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |