Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Vide Spinozam, or Burchard de Volder between Cartesianism and Heterodoxy

Bibliographic Data

ID21198136
AuthorsAndrea Strazzoni (0000-0001-5552-2592, University of Basel, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume100
Issue2-3
Pages272-286
Publication date2020-09-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueChurch History and Religious Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1871-241X • E-ISSN: 1871-2428
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1163/18712428-10002008
OpenAlexW3125266413
LanguageEN

In this article, I intervene in a long-standing debate over the alleged assumption and teaching of Spinozist ideas by the Dutch philosopher and scientist Burchard de Volder (1643–1709). I discuss De Volder’s position with respect to three main topics (necessitarianism, substance monism, and biblical interpretation), as well as the use his student Jacob Wittich made of De Volder’s ideas in Wittich’s highly controversial De natura Dei (1711). Eventually, I argue that De Volder was certainly a sympathizer of Spinoza, accepted necessitarianism, and considered Spinoza a reliable interpreter of Descartes in physics, even if he did not accept Spinoza’s monist metaphysics, nor his biblical hermeneutics

Cartesianism · Epistemology · Hermeneutics · Heterodoxy · Linguistics · Metaphysics · Monism · Orthodoxy · Theology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae