Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Should I Just Stick to the Wall? Evaluating the Social Acceptance and Preferred Driving Side of Wall Following

Bibliographic Data

ID21199745
AuthorsNicole Robinson (0000-0002-7144-3082, Monash University, corresponding author), Christopher Tsz-Hang Yeung (Monash University), Akansel Cosgun (0000-0003-4203-6477, Deakin University)
Year2024
Volume16
Issue7
Pages1693-1705
Publication date2024-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Social Robotics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1875-4791 • E-ISSN: 1875-4805
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s12369-024-01141-1
OpenAlexW4399357952
LanguageEN
References cited30

The need for safe, predictable, and reliable robot navigation is fundamental for mobile robots to move around in home and office environments. Shortest-path navigation is a popular robot navigation method that uses the most efficient path to get to the desired goal. This behaviour is not always easy to interpret, understand, and avoid in a congested hallway. Instead, more predictable navigation methods, such as a robot following a wall, can help increase social acceptance and help avoid the robot crossing the pedestrian path. If a robot follows along a wall, a key variable to consider is the preferred driving side of the robot (left or right) in areas such as in narrow passages, and its perceived impact on social acceptance. This international user study (n = 143) involved an online video-based test to compare robot evaluation and social acceptance for two types of mobile navigation (Wall-Following and Shortest Path), including the preferred driving side for Wall-Following. A Fetch robot navigated from start to goal position in a series of indoor scenarios with a pedestrian. Select scenarios included a hallway, doorway, and intersection. Independent Sample T-Tests results found that Wall-Following was rated significantly higher than Shortest Path for being perceived as more comfortable and predictable, regardless of robot driving side. The preference for the driver side of the robot did not match the country of residence, nor did it have a significant impact on robot ratings. There were significant interaction effects for comfort, safety and predictable scores across two timepoints. Given the popularity of Shortest Path navigation, the findings indicate that this approach might not be the most appropriate for human settings. Additional investigation into Wall-Following behaviours is recommended for social acceptance, even if the method compromises the efficiency of the robot to acheive its objective

Computer vision · Human–computer interaction · Mobile robot · Mobile robot navigation · Pedestrian · Rescue robot · Robot · Robot control · Simulation · Social robot · Transport engineering · Computer Science · Engineering · Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics · Human-Automation Interaction and Safety · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Artificial Intelligence

  • Human Understanding of Robot Motion

    Open Access•Frank Papenmeier, Meike Uhrig et al.•International Journal of Social…•2018

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae