Understanding the Artificial
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21199828 |
|---|---|
| Authors | H J van den Herik (0000-0001-9751-761X, Tilburg University, corresponding author), Maarten H Lamers (0000-0003-2672-5475, Leiden University), Maarten Lamers, Fons J Verbeek (0000-0003-2445-8158, Leiden University), Fons Verbeek |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 107-109 |
| Publication date | 2011-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Social Robotics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1875-4791 • E-ISSN: 1875-4805 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12369-011-0093-z |
| OpenAlex | W2086206228 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
The state of the art of robotics is currently hotly debated by two sides providing us with arguments from different perspectives. The technology-driven side tells that the world is driven and run by technological developments, and that robots are here for further enhancements and new applications. It means no less than that technology dictates the governance. The society-driven side opines that the world is driven and run by social aspects. The society (of human beings) dictates the governance. For instance, legislative drafting comes from humans and is not imposed by technological possibilities. Remarkably enough, both sides claim that they understand the artificial. For the technology-driven side, it is a reason to have robots involved in their procedures and developments; for the society-driven side, the reverse is true, they believe that further developing of the artificial should be initiated by human beings
Business · Corporate governance · Economics · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Management · Political science · Robot · Robotics · Sociology · Wonder · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Philosophy · Artificial Intelligence
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2019 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |