Challenges of trust in atypical interaction
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21201331 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Camilla Lindholm (0000-0001-9220-5414, Tampere University), M Stevanovic (0000-0002-0429-1672, Tampere University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 107-125 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Pragmatics and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1878-9714 • E-ISSN: 1878-9722 |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/ps.18077.lin |
| OpenAlex | W4221107468 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 43 |
All effective communication is based on the participants trusting that they share their basic orientations to the world – that is, they have a common ground. In this paper, however, we examine situations in which such trust is lacking. Drawing on conversation–analytic methodology and on 30 hours of video data featuring persons with dementia and their caregivers in a Swedish-language daycare center in Finland, we consider some of the social consequences resulting from a lack of trust. Our analysis focused on three different interactional contexts, highlighting the relevance of different facets of the participants’ common ground. These facets are anchored in the deontic, epistemic, and emotional orders, respectively. We show that, with regard to each order, a lack of trust in the existence of common ground has drastic consequences, leading to (1) problems related to getting one’s will acknowledged, (2) a scarcity of conversational partners, and (3) a lack of resources to maintain affection
Affection · Business · Common ground · Conversation · Conversation analysis · Deontic logic · Epistemology · Interpersonal communication · Political science · Scarcity · Sociology · Communication · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Social Psychology
The management of daily topics in conversations with individuals with Alzheimer's disease in Chinese residential care
The First Step in Triadic Decision-Making Involving People with Dementia
Positive assessments, monitoring of activities, and dementia
Trust-indicating pragmatic markers in selected African englishes
Approaching Dialogue
Using Language
Interaction and Grammar
Interaction Ritual
‘Faultless’ ignorance
Speaking Our Minds
Seeing Sociologically
The Rules of Sociological Method
Just teasing
Conversational Practices of a Frontotemporal Dementia Patient and His Interlocutors
Epistemics in Action
Atypical Interaction
The Use of Directives to Repair Embodied (Mis)Understandings in Interactions with Individuals Diagnosed with Frontotemporal Dementia
Co-Constructing Meaning in Conversations With an Aphasie Man
Parallel Realities
Mind, Self, and Society from the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist
Working out availability, unavailability and awayness in social face-to-face encounters
Po-faced receipts of teases
The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge
Three orders in the organization of human action
Social Actions, Gestalt Coherence, and Designations of Disability
How to Go On
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |