Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Compounding and derivation

On the ‘promiscuity’ of derivational affixes

Bibliographic Data

ID21201581
AuthorsJuana M Liceras (0000-0002-7909-2651, University of Ottawa), Reg Klassen (0000-0002-1909-863X, University of Ottawa), Rachel Klassen (University of Ottawa)
Year2019
Volume9
Issue1
Pages42-72
Publication date2019-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLinguistic Approaches to Bilingualism (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1879-9264 • E-ISSN: 1879-9272
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/lab.16026.lic
OpenAlexW2753651584
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited13

Inflectional affixes only adhere to the head of Noun-Noun (NN) compounds which implies that the plural of casa cuna (‘crib house’) or hombre lobo (‘werewolf’) is casa- s cuna (‘crib houses’) and hombre- s lobo (‘werewolves’) respectively, while *casa cuna- s and *hombre lobo- s ‒ with the plural inflectional affix on the modifier ‒ are ungrammatical. There seems to be more flexibility when it comes to derivational affixes since, in principle, the evaluative diminutive affix - ito appears to have scope over the whole compound, regardless of whether it is attached to the head or the modifier: cas- ita cuna / casa cun- ita and hombre-c- ito lobo / hombre lob- ito . This would imply that the operation that results in the expression of plurality of the whole word via the inflectional affix - s located on the semantic argument (the head of the compound), is more categorical than the one that regulates the scope of derivational morphemes (contra Zwicky, 1985 ). It would also imply that Cinque’s (2005) proposal according to which modifiers can c-command Nouns may be more in line with the behaviour of derivational affixes in Spanish NN compounds. Since this is a topic that has neither been discussed by Spanish grammarians nor received attention in the psycholinguistic literature, we have administered a Picture Selection Task with NN compounds exhibiting evaluative diminutive affixes to groups of L1 Spanish and L1 English-L2 Spanish speakers. Results show that for L1 Spanish speakers it is the affix on the head that has scope over the whole compound (in line with Zwicky’s 1985 proposal) while the L2 Spanish speakers treat derivational affixes as only having scope over the element to which they are attached

Affix · Biology · Diminutive · Linguistics · Morpheme · Noun · Plural · Verb · Computer Science · EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning · History · Medicine · Philosophy · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning · Spanish Linguistics and Language Studies

  • Representation and processing in bilingual morphology

    Open Access•Jennifer Austin•Linguistic Approaches to…•2019

  • French V-N compounds

    Open Access•Nathalie Schapansky•Lingua•2023

  • The Oxford Handbook of Developmental Linguistics

    Jeffrey Lidz, Jeffrey L Lidz et al.•Oxford Handbook of Developmental…•2016

  • What's the difference between ‘toilet paper’ and ‘paper toilet’? French-English bilingual children's crosslinguistic transfer in compound nouns

    Open Access•Elena Nicoladis•Journal of Child Language•2002

  • Evolution and Revolution in Linguistic Theory

    John M Lipski, Héctor Campos et al.•Language•1997

  • Heads

    Open Access•Arnold M Zwicky•Journal of Linguistics•1985

  • Deriving Greenberg's Universal 20 and Its Exceptions

    Guglielmo Cinque•Linguistic Inquiry•2005

Citations per year0.29
Citation span2019 - 2023 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae