Once More with Feeling
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21203843 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Beebe (0000-0002-5747-2450, Cadence Design Systems (United States), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 28-39 |
| Publication date | 2009-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Jung Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1934-2039 • E-ISSN: 1934-2047 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1525/jung.2009.3.4.28 |
| OpenAlex | W2331761028 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
In a response to the previous unpublished final lecture of Marie-Louise von Franz, “C. G. Jung’s Rehabilitation of the Feeling Function in Our Civilization,” the author notes that von Franz’s true theme is not rehabilitation of feeling by Jung or anyone else, but the dismal state of it in our global civilization today. The author finds an alchemical method in von Franz’s pessimistic manner of approaching this topic and credits her for dealing with the inferior feeling of our culture by exhibiting and trusting her own inferior feeling in the writing of this lecture. Coming from that place, he feels, allows von Franz to be more authentic and more naturally eloquent than in her more carefully thought-out articles. He believes she is modeling the trust in one’s own subjectivity that is required to make the feeling function welcome again in our culture. Key Words: affectivityalchemyemotionerosextraverted feelingfeeling functionindividuationintro-verted feelingJames HillmanC. G. JungJungian typologylogos Psychological Types sacrificium intellecti shadow solutio subjectivityTertullianMarie-Louise von FranzJoseph WheelwrightWilliam Willeford
Aesthetics · Art · Civilization · Epistemology · Feeling · Literature · Pessimism · Psychoanalysis · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Computer Science · History · Jungian Analytical Psychology · Philosophy · Psychology · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices · Social Psychology
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |