Revisiting the Rise and Decline of Authoritarian Neoliberalism
A Political Economy Analysis of Akp’s Initial Decade
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21207799 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ümit Akçay (0000-0003-0514-4831, Berlin School of Economics and Law, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 972-987 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1944-8953 • E-ISSN: 1944-8961 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/19448953.2024.2311489 |
| OpenAlex | W4391390554 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
This paper offers a fresh and nuanced perspective by re-examining the concept of authoritarian neoliberalism in the context of the first decade of the AKP’s rule in Turkey. The study addresses two main research questions: Firstly, it explores the factors that transformed the 2000s, often seen as a period of democratization, into an era of authoritarianism. Secondly, it investigates how the AKP effectively established an authoritarian neoliberal state during this time. To tackle these questions, the paper argues that the AKP’s authoritarian neoliberal project rests on two key pillars. The first pillar involves creating a depoliticized technocratic state structure that allows for the implementation of policies aligning with the interests of the dominant capital faction. The second element involves weakening labor opposition, which plays a crucial role in shaping the authoritarian neoliberal state. The paper suggests that the waning influence of the labor movement played a central role in driving the shift toward authoritarianism in the 2000s, granting the government more flexibility in shaping policies. This paper enhances our understanding of the political and economic transformation in Turkey during this significant period, shedding light on the development of the authoritarian neoliberal state and its crisis after 2013
Authoritarianism · Democracy · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Global Financial Crisis and Policies · International Development and Aid · Law
| Citations per year | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |