Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Conservatives Are More Reluctant to Give and Receive Apologies Than Liberals

Bibliographic Data

ID21210022
AuthorsMatthew J Hornsey (0000-0003-1275-3977, The University of Queensland, corresponding author), Karina Schumann (0000-0002-9907-2383, University of Pittsburgh), Paul G Bain (0000-0001-5521-2738, Queensland University of Technology), Sheyla Blumen (0000-0002-9960-7413, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú), Sylvia Xiaohua Chen (0000-0001-7237-6523, Hong Kong Polytechnic University), Antonio Gomez (0000-0002-4287-4916, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia), Ángel Gómez (Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain), Roberto González (0000-0002-1824-6215, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile), Yanjun Guan (0000-0003-1782-1027, Durham University), Emiko Kashima (0000-0002-7534-7047, LaTrobe University, Melbourne, Australia), Emiko S Kashima (0000-0001-7281-7173, La Trobe University), Nadezhda Lebedeva (0000-0002-2046-4529, Moscow Power Engineering Institute), Michael J A Wohl (0000-0001-6945-5562, Carleton University)
Year2017
Volume8
Issue7
Pages827-835
Publication date2017-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Psychological and Personality Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1948-5506 • E-ISSN: 1948-5514
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1948550617691096
OpenAlexW2593830212
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited37

This article examines the proposition that conservatives will be less willing than liberals to apologize and less likely to forgive after receiving an apology. In Study 1, we found evidence for both relationships in a nine-nation survey. In Study 2, participants wrote an open-ended response to a victim of a hypothetical transgression they had committed. More conservative participants were less likely to include apologetic elements in their response. We also tested two underlying mechanisms for the associations: social dominance orientation (SDO) and entity beliefs about human nature. SDO emerged as a stronger and more consistent mediator than entity beliefs. Apologies are theorized to be a rhetorical vehicle for removing power inequities in relationships posttransgression. Consistent with this theorizing, it was those who are relatively high in commitment to equality (i.e., those high in liberal ideology and low in SDO) who are most likely to provide and reward apologies

Epistemology · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Proposition · Rhetorical question · Social dominance orientation · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Forgiveness and Related Behaviors · Law · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Political segmentation based on pictorial preferences on social media

    Open Access•Mehmet Özer Demir, Biagio Simonetti et al.•Quality & Quantity•2023

  • The Association between ideology and resistance to governmental apology depends on political knowledge

    Open Access•Kazunori Inamasu, Shoko Kohama et al.•Japanese Journal of Political…•2023

  • Parents’ Proclivity to Apologize to Their Romantic Partner is Associated with Positive Parental Attitudes on Apologies and Parental Apology Prompting

    Open Access•Mariana Almaraz Reyes, Janet Kuebli et al.•Contemporary Family Therapy•2024

  • Conceptualizing forgiveness

    Open Access•Daniel L Brady, Maria Francisca Saldanha et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2023

  • Assessing the Role of Honour Culture and Image Concerns in Impeding Apologies

    Open Access•Alexander Kirchner-Häusler, Ayse K Uskul et al.•European Journal of Social…•2025

  • Analysis of congressmembers' statements following George Floyd's death

    Open Access•Kristin Layous, Negin R Toosi et al.•Political Psychology•2025

  • Mea culpa

    Nicholas Tavuchis•Mea culpa•1991

  • What Happens When Groups Say Sorry

    Open Access•Catherine R Philpot, Catherine Philpot et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2008

  • Repairing and Enhancing Trust

    Roderick M Kramer, Roy J Lewicki•Academy of Management Annals•2010

  • Remorse, Confession, Group Identity, and Expectancies About Repeating a Transgression

    Gregg J Gold, Bernard Weiner•Basic and Applied Social Psychology•2000

  • Weird languages have misled us, too

    Open Access•A Majid, C Levinson et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2010

  • Promises and lies

    Open Access•Maurice E Schweitzer, John C Hershey et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•2006

  • Efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions to promote forgiveness

    Nathaniel G Wade, William T Hoyt et al.•Journal of Consulting and…•2014

  • The Role of Agency and Morality in Reconciliation Processes

    Open Access•Nurit Shnabel, Arie Nadler•Current Directions in Psychological…•2015

  • The weirdest people in the world?

    Open Access•J Henrich, Steven J Heine et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2010

  • Social Dominance in Context and in Individuals

    Open Access•Felicia Pratto, Atilla Cidam et al.•Social Psychological and…•2013

  • A Critical Review of Official Public Apologies

    Open Access•Michael J A Wohl, Matthew J Hornsey et al.•Social Issues and Policy Review•2011

  • We are sorry

    Matthew J Hornsey, Michael J A Wohl•European Review of Social…•2013

  • The Role of Acceptance and Empowerment in Promoting Reconciliation from the Perspective of the Needs‐Based Model

    Open Access•Nurit Shnabel, Arie Nadler et al.•Social Issues and Policy Review•2008

  • Sex differences in restoring justice

    Open Access•Michael N O'Malley, Jerald Greenberg•Journal of Research in Personality•1983

  • Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality

    Chi-Yue Chiu, Chi‐yue Chiu et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1997

  • Perpetrator groups can enhance their moral self-image by accepting their own intergroup apologies

    Open Access•Fiona Barlow, Fiona Kate Barlow et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2015

  • Longer-term consequences of anger expression in negotiation

    Open Access•Gerben A Van Kleef, Carsten K W De Dreu•Journal of Experimental Social…•2010

  • The apology mismatch

    Open Access•Joost M Leunissen, David De Cremer et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2012

  • Apologies demanded yet devalued

    Open Access•Tyler G Okimoto, Michael Wenzel et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2015

  • Social dominance orientation

    Felicia Pratto, Jim Sidanius et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1994

  • Basic Personal Values and the Meaning of Left‐Right Political Orientations in 20 Countries

    Open Access•Yuval Piurko, Shalom H Schwartz et al.•Political Psychology•2011

  • A needs-based model of reconciliation

    Nurit Shnabel, Arie Nadler•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008

  • European Journal of Social Psychology

    Ara Norenzayan, Norbert Schwarz•European Journal of Social…•2006

  • The nature of social dominance orientation

    Arnold K Ho, Jim Sidanius et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2015

  • Implicit Theories and Their Role in Judgments and Reactions

    Carol S Dweck, Chi-Yue Chiu et al.•Psychological Inquiry•1995

  • Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies

    Open Access•John D Huber, John Huber et al.•Party Politics•1995

  • The road to forgiveness

    Ryan Fehr, Michele J Gelfand et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2010

Unique citing works6
Citations per year2
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae