Refractive datasets as a sensemaking methodology in closed data ecosystems
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21214679 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Anna Beers (0009-0005-9085-6412, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, corresponding author), Viviane Ito (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Agustin Orozco (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Patrick Gildersleve (0000-0003-3714-6823, University of Exeter), Pablo Aragón (0000-0002-6017-4577, Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Francesca Bolla Tripodi (0000-0002-0859-6377, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Big Data & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20539517251406193 |
| OpenAlex | W4417466025 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 60 |
As digital platforms restrict their APIs, researchers face diminishing options for studying social phenomena in digital environments. During what has been called the post-API era, researchers have found themselves looking for reliable data sources in an unreliable and frequently changing platform data ecosystem. In this context, we propose analyzing refractive datasets as a methodology for researchers to understand the dynamics of closed data platforms. Refractive datasets come from platforms with relatively more open data policies, and their analysis sheds light on platforms with more restrictive data policies. Like a prism, refractive datasets reflect but also transform data-based phenomena unfolding on closed platforms. Using refractive datasets from Wikipedia and Google Trends, we present three studies to demonstrate our methodology. We first show how refractive data from Wikipedia's multiple language editions can be used to understand a fractured global platform ecosystem in a case study of hydroxychloroquine, a purported COVID-19 medicine. Second, we use Google Trends to show how similar refractive analyses can be used to understand information lost to platform deletion, in a profile of an online panic over the drug brand Galaxy Gas. Finally, we show how Wikipedia data can be used as a grounding point for a refractive analysis of how new generative algorithms reproduce and distort data across the social web. We discuss how refractive datasets can be a way for researchers to “sensemake” in increasingly opaque big data environments, enabling interpretivist analyses which aim to generate new hypotheses rather than verify existing claims
Big data · Data modeling · Sensemaking · Social media · Topic model · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Wikis in Education and Collaboration
HashtagActivism
The Parable of Google Flu
Internet Search Data and Issue Salience
Beyond the Hashtags
Forecasting private consumption
The Use of Google Trends in Health Care Research
Gephi
Computational Social Science
Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
Wikipedia and AI
Demystifying disinformation shadow economies
‘Do your own research
Systemic Determinants of International News Coverage
Uniting and reigniting critical Wikimedia research
WhatsApp as 'technology of life'
Data activism and social media in the case of racialized and gendered deaths and disappearances
Ms. Categorized
The (mis)use of Google Trends data in the social sciences - A systematic review, critique, and recommendations
Navigating Big Data dilemmas
We Never Really Talked About politics
Computational Research in the Post-API Age
The Data Abyss
Mere Description
Critical Questions for Big Data
Google, data voids, and the dynamics of the politics of exclusion
Taking a critical look at the critical turn in data science
Excavating awareness and power in data science
Shadow Politics
Wikidata as Semantic Infrastructure
This Isn't Your Data, Friend
Where Have All the Data Gone? A Critical Reflection on Academic Digital Research in the Post-API Age
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |